Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT Caves To Bush: White House Gets Sub-Headline Correction

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 01:56 PM
Original message
NYT Caves To Bush: White House Gets Sub-Headline Correction
White House Gets Sub-Headline Correction
By Paul Kiel - December 19, 2007, 1:37PM

Victory! Or not quite. The White House's public freak-out over the New York Times has won them... a correction to the Times' sub-headline:

Catherine Mathis, senior vice president of corporate communications for the newspaper, stated that the sub-headline has been changed, adding that a correction would be printed. However, Mathis also pointed out that the White House did not challenge the contents of the article.

more at:
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004946.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Big deal the NYT already gave them this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. GAH! The thugs in the WH need to leave the media alone!!!!!!!!
GAH!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. A once-great newspaper sinks lower and lower. National Enquirer, anyone?
Edited on Wed Dec-19-07 02:36 PM by Benhurst
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Remember when the New York Times was a news outlet?
Something to tell my grandchildren someday. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Will the NYT be correcting all the erroneous info they published about Iraq and WMD?
Maybe the NYT will print corrections for the hatchet jobs they've published on Al Gore, John Kerry, and other Democrats?

Didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. All it means is Bushco never said how involved it was, so
technically how could their involvement be more than they said? That's all they quivelled about. They didn't say they were not involved. Ya gotta watch for these non-denial denials.

from the article cited in the OP

I hope the Times runs a correction tomorrow ("A headline claimed "White House Role Wider Than It Said." In fact, White House spokesmen have repeatedly declined to comment on the extent to which White House officials obstructed justice; it was an array of administration officials who misled reporters into believing that the White House had abided by the law in this matter. We regret the error.) so that we can all shift the focus back to where it belongs - to what the White House did, not what it now claims to have done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Gray Lady is a whore.
And a cheap whore at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Typical fascist control of the media.
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. NYTimes ...
2005 they tell the world about illegal wiretapping of U.S. citizens ... that was going on in 2004 ... that they knew about well before the 2004 election, but kept quiet ...

2007, they tell the world that the illegal wiretapping of U.S. citizens was going on longer than expected ... well before 9/11/2001 ... wonder how long they sat on that nugget ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC