|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:07 AM Original message |
Why I don't support John Edwards: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
1. Nothing new here. The food is bad and the price is too high. Don't stop and feed here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:11 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. can't address the points in the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:12 AM Original message |
So is the OP...my point is...it is without merit in terms of substance, just emotional badgering. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
6. That seems to be the M.O. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:12 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. So is the OP...my point is...it is without merit in terms of substance, just emotional badgering. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:14 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. really? so his senate record is out of bounds and so is his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Please join us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:17 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. What are you doing hanging around the buffet, then, if the food sucks so bad? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
4. I can't stand him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:22 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Look, I didn't call him names |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:31 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Yeah buddy, here it is! The always predictable 'I didn't mean this' or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:43 AM Response to Reply #14 |
22. oh get over yourself - or don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 01:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
45. Oh shit, you're funny. You deliver another one of your trite and tacky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #45 |
59. temper, temper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #22 |
57. I'm an Edwards supporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:03 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:32 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Really, why in the world are you surprised?? NOT. Are you someone famous or important? If you are, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:03 PM Response to Reply #10 |
26. Your thread doesn't have to be a big contributor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:11 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. No, it's that I don't think the hosannas are justified and that people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. Because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:22 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. No. that's true. But it was a thread attacking numerous DUers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 04:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
77. "I didn't...bring up fatuous crap about him" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
9. personally, the ONLY one I trust is Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:34 AM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Unless you know Dennis personally, it is best to not put him on a higher plane than others. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:43 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ninga
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:49 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. You are correct about that. My point is that to isolate and latch on to one particular value, even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
41. I'm not sure "higher-plane" would be descriptive of my views |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 05:49 PM Response to Reply #17 |
94. I trust Dennis more than I trust Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
11. he isnt anti-corporate, he's anti-Fascist, every family farm and business is a corporation for legal... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU9598
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
12. Other than his reluctant vote on the IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:35 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. His "reluctant vote"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:41 AM Response to Reply #12 |
20. It wasn't reluctant. He co-sponsored the IWR and his speeches at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 04:56 PM Response to Reply #12 |
85. A slice of his voting record... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inspired
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
13. It's too bad you can't see the man that I do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
16. I don't trust any politician. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #16 |
48. Bingo, doing that is what brings US power! Endorsing the best platform is saying what WE want! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 02:38 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandyd921
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:36 PM Response to Reply #48 |
71. A very common sense approach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:47 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. It will also help us push harder on congress who DID ignore what we voted them in for! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandyd921
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. Absolutely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nradisic
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
18. you need to get over it.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:45 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Fortress. His co-sponsoring the IWR. His vote for bankruptcy reform |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 02:48 PM Response to Reply #23 |
52. Cali is for Hillary, enough said. If Cali is that empty, which she is, don't read her posts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 02:52 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. pleasant or not pleasant. I don't support hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 02:59 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Are you kidding? You are so nasty in tone. You are a lot like Ann. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #58 |
63. I push back when people attack me. It's that simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #52 |
67. Oh no she's not. She'll tell you that with every pro-Hillary post she writes. (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. ok, honeybuns. put up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:48 PM Response to Reply #69 |
73. Actually, the most amazing thing (to me) is how long your flamebait posts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 04:00 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. after what you posted to me, I have no compunction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 04:10 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. Actually, the rules at DU apply to you too. Well, some of the time, anyway. (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. I can't compete with your level |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laureloak
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
24. You're afraid. You stalk pro Edwards threads and post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prefer
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:12 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Thanks for cluing me in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 02:51 PM Response to Reply #24 |
53. I agree. The OP seems obsessed with JE. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. lets see. I've started 7 threads about JE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 06:28 PM Response to Reply #56 |
95. Did you know that only the... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueJac
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
27. Yes Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:13 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. What part of, "I prefer JE over Clinton" is beyond your reading comprehension |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:15 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. There you go with the food insults again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. It's my thing, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:25 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. Finally! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftCoast
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
30. Cali, I think you've just proven it's impossible to have a reasonable discussion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. It's what always happens when DU builds itself an untouchable hero |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 02:54 PM Response to Reply #30 |
55. Wow- you have obviously missed her daily screeds against Edwards in GD-P |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:08 PM Response to Reply #55 |
62. That's simply bullshit. I have started 7 Edwards threads over that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:18 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. Well then there must be two Cali's here on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. Or you simply have a very distorted lens because it's seriously distorted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
36. I don't trust Clinton and Obama hasn't revealed enough to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:24 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. What bothers me is that I find the Fortress thing directly contradicts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lazer47
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. If you can double your investment in a "Hedge Fund" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 01:04 PM Response to Reply #42 |
43. You're kidding, right? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lazer47
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 01:21 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. What is a Hedge Fund??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 01:49 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Hedge funds are wildly underregulated. Hedge Fund managers are grossly undertaxed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
40. I agree with you to a certain respect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
47. I have to agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #47 |
61. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
49. That's a laugh riot.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 02:44 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Deleted sub-thread |
Quixote1818
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
64. The reason I do trust him is because he doesn't stumble |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:16 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. Thanks for explaining why you do support him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:23 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. We are rolling the dice with all of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
74. This coming from the same OP who complained that Edwards isn't "middle" enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 04:05 PM Response to Reply #74 |
78. wtf?? I posted a query about whether, if he's the nom, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 04:22 PM Response to Reply #78 |
81. The only "blathering" is coming from your end |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. I claimed that all candidates from both parties always shift from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
82. Phew. There was such following for John I dare not speak this but 04 was enough for me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinksrival
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 07:24 PM Response to Reply #82 |
96. You can say that again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
83. Phew. There was such following for John I dare not speak this but 04 was enough for me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
86. You are obsessed with John Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 05:31 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. More pointless hypebole. Today I posted a thread about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 05:36 PM Response to Reply #88 |
90. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 05:41 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. As were you, my dear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThePowerofWill
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
87. It's kinda a smear, but honest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 05:33 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. *sigh* I post far more often about other things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThePowerofWill
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 05:38 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. Oh i'm sure you do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal
![]() |
Sun Dec-23-07 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
93. DU is like any other freeper-dominated board: mention facts, get flamed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC