|
Edited on Mon Dec-24-07 08:26 PM by RainDog
after the fall of Rome when Visigoths were taking the empire? I'm talking about pre-barbarian invasions of Rome, which is even before Viking invasions of Gallic Celt land. Gallic Celts were already in the region now known as France, Belgium, etc. in 400 bc. Rome fell AD - about 300/400 AD is considered the final collapse. Ceasar's memoirs of The Gallic Wars talks about his fights with the Gallic Celts, the Belgae, Parisii, Helvetii and Aquitani. These were people who had migrated from the balkins/black sea/turky northwest up the Danube. Druids, or a priestly class, were part of Gallic Celt culture and their religion, not Nordic gods, was transferred in the migrations to Scotland and Ireland, Wales, etc. You can google this history and it will be verified over and over. The archeological evidence supports this western migration. This was an iron age culture.
here's one source via about.com concerning the history of the celts, but you can find many that say this exact same thing.
Around 1500-1000BC, the Celts lived in an area which today is mostly in Eastern France. The area stretched from roughly where Luxemburg is today to a bit further south than Geneva and took in parts of modern day West Germany and Switzerland. It was an area a little bigger than the island of Ireland.
The Celts then expanded to cover an area covering most of Western Europe and Central Europe. Around 400BC, the Celts lived in what is now called Britain, Ireland, France (i.e. Gaul), Luxemburg, Belgium, Switzerland, Austria, and the Czech and Slovak Republics. Celts also lived in parts of Spain (notable Galicia), northern Italy, The Netherlands, the southern half of Germany, and parts of Poland and Russia (source: "The Story of English", Faber and Faber; BBC books 1992).
After the height of their power, the Celts (the first Indo-European group to spread across Europe) were pushed north and west by sucessive waves of Indo-European peoples, notably Germanic and Latin based. The main migration was by the Galli or Gauls into France, northern Italy and the north of Europe.
from wiki about Gallic (Gaulic, Gaelic) Celts-
The Gauls were Celts which was a word coined in the 17th century to describe the people that inhabited the British Isle and Gaul which not only consisted of France but parts of spain and northern Italy....Three tribes of Gauls crossed over from Thrace to Asia Minor at the express invitation of Nicomedes I, king of Bithynia, who required help in a dynastic struggle against his brother. Eventually they settled down in eastern Phrygia and Cappadocia in central Anatolia, a region henceforth known as Galatia.
-this, again, was BC. 74-ish BC. check it out via Encyclopedia Brittanica.
as noted before, they migrated west. they were not vikings. the norsemen or normans were far later than the celts, defeated them and made themselves an aristocratic class but intermarried with the celts remaining in the area -many had already migrated to Great Brit. These were the normans that comprised The Normandy Invasion - but the Normans were not celts as a group unto themselves. Again, the celts, as ceasar and others described, had their own culture(s). The Normans occupied France in 800s AD. They eventually took over areas in what would now be considered Turkey.
maybe we're simply talking about time differences. normans were credited with medieval conquest, but not with populating what is now western europe beyond Germany.
think that might be the difference?
|