Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DOJ efforts to block whistleblower's award rejected

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 09:22 AM
Original message
DOJ efforts to block whistleblower's award rejected
Whistle-Blower Is Awarded $1.6 Million

A former drug sales representative who became a whistle-blower has been awarded $1.6 million for bringing a drug marketing fraud to light, despite efforts by the Justice Department to prevent his receiving the money.

But in the same ruling, a federal judge criticized the former sales representative, James Marchese, for not bringing the scheme to light earlier, given that he thought that cancer patients were being harmed as a result of the fraud.

Mr. Marchese’s case, which was described in an October article in The New York Times, drew attention because prosecutors had rarely argued that a whistle-blower should be denied any portion of the funds recovered from a lawsuit he or she initiated.

To do so, prosecutors must show that a whistle-blower was the planner or initiator of the scheme involved; otherwise he or she is legally entitled to receive 15 to 25 percent of any funds recovered by the government. The precise figure is determined by a whistle-blower’s contribution to the case.

In a ruling after a two-day hearing last month in Seattle, Judge Marsha J. Pechman of Federal District Court found that prosecutors had failed to prove that Mr. Marchese was the initiator of a scheme at his former employer, Cell Therapeutics. In April, the company agreed to pay $10.5 million to settle charges that it had bilked Medicare out of that much money in connection with the sale of a cancer drug, Trisenox.

At the hearing, Mr. Marchese and his lawyers argued that he should receive 25 percent, about $2.6 million. Among other things, Mr. Marchese maintained that the government would never have had a case without him.

NY Times - Read Full Article


Why ask why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. the Goodling attorneys are doing their bestest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Their recent 'efforts' to protect the oxycotin executives from jail sentences was just as strange.
Edited on Wed Dec-26-07 10:28 AM by flashl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC