Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does being pregnant mean one should not be a member of Congress?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:27 AM
Original message
Does being pregnant mean one should not be a member of Congress?
I don't have a link, but this is a letter that appeared in the Post-Star of Glens Falls, NY:
***************************************************************************************
Editor:
Regarding a story that appeared in

The Post-Star on Dec. 6: "Rep. Gillibrand announces she is pregnant."

First of all, I must admit that I am a male chauvinist and that there are, thankfully, differences between men and women. There are many occupations suitable for women and their physical attributes. Carrying a weapon while serving in the Armed Forces and firefighting are not suitable lines of work for women to prove that they are physically equal to men. How many male police officers feel comfortable with a 100 pound female backup?

And now, I have to add serving in the U.S. House and Senate as an occupation that may not be suitable for women.

Ms. Gillibrand's current pregnancy makes a strong case for my opinion. Ms. Gillibrand was elected to serve her constituency, and while she is away from her elected office she cannot perform those duties. The taxpayers who were duped into voting for her will have to pay for her medical benefits. Yes, Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer, Ms. Gillibrand receives excellent health benefits, courtesy of her constituents. We will be without representation in Congress for a time leading up to and following the child's birth. There will be times when she and the new baby will visit doctors. You can add those days to the total that she will not be serving her constituents.

The current base salary (2006) for members of the House and Senate is $165,200 per year. I wonder if Ms. Gillibrand will do the right thing and reimburse the U.S. Treasury in the amount of $452.60, her daily salary, for each day that she is unable to perform her elected duties. For some reason, I doubt it.

RON XXXX
Queensbury
************************************************************************************
:puke::puke:

What the hell is wrong with people? So now women should not be allowed to serve in Congress if they are of child-bearing age?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I guess women who have to see the doctor need to reimburse their
employer as well for the time spent away?

Ron is a thoughtless pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Perhaps all members of
congress should be sterilized :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. And just how well were Stormin' Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms serving their constituents?
Their senility and incapacity lasted for YEARS, not weeks, but is this asshole whining about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. nor is he whining
about Cheney's "pre-existing" heart condition...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder what Bushco could offer families of dead/maimed soldiers as "reimbursement".
I'd say a pregnant woman is far more able to serve American interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Un-freaking-real
I would love to find this guy in a dark alley...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. Women belong in the house
And the Senate, and the Supreme Court and (why not?) the White House as well. Should we disqualify men from such positions because they might get an erection?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. ...
:spray:

Thanks :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. I bet Ron either lives in his mom's basement.........
.....or gets the shit kicked out of him every night by his wife "Olga".

STFU, dickweed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. I really want to go confront him on this one....
This is so disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wonder how many truffles this nut managed to find on his own for Christmas?
I'd personally LOVE a close look into his background. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. I am so close to looking him up in the phonebook
and going to picket his house...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. Check this out
Ron and his wife
According to the article he retired while in his mid 50's.
He was in the Army in 1966.
He might be 61.


From Google it appears that he is getting a lot of static about his letter in the Post and other newspapers. Most likely, he has received phone calls and possibly been berated by his fellow citizens in Queensbury. His wife might be embarrassed by it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Oh YEAH - his email is there too.
You are a star LiberalFighter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. This was a LTTE? Enough said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. How can this possibly be an issue? Most working American women
have no choice but to stay on the job during their pregnancies. Is she planning to take a long maternity leave? God knows Congress has set up first-rate day schools with infant care for their children -- nothing but the best for our "leaders." She'll face few of the difficulties most American mothers have to deal with, plus have a nice fat salary and lavish perks as well.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. It's Only An Issue In Ron's Tiny Mind
Hence, you are correct.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
15. If this was a LTTE then the name should not had been deleted
Any letter writer accepts their name to be made public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I took his name out - his full name appears in
the paper. I was not sure if I could put his name on there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Post a link to the letter as I just did below
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #21
34. and then go to zabasearch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
18. If their name is Spears, the answer to the subject line is YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
19. Here is someone's response the the LTTE
http://www.poststar.com/articles/2007/12/27/opinion/letters/13204603.txt

Editor:

I was appalled that you published Mr. Blachut's sexist letter Dec. 20 concerning Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand's pregnancy and that he thinks this makes her "not suitable" for Congress.

Shall we require all public servants to be sterilized? Shall we test male congressmen for diseases which could make them miss work to go to a doctor's appointment? Bar diabetics from public office?

Vice President Cheney seems to miss a lot of work due to his health problems, but I don't see Mr. Blachut complaining about his taxpayer money going to fund Cheney's health insurance.

I think the self-admitted male chauvinist, Mr. Blachut, is living in the past. It is against the law for an employer to fire an employee for being pregnant, and it has been since 1964.

I think we should be proud that Representative Gillibrand is the sixth woman in U.S. history to be both a congresswoman and expecting a baby.

ENID MASTRIANNI

Glens Falls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Yes, I was sent that letter by a friend who knows this
respondent since he knew I was crazed by the original LTTE.

Thanks for the link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
20. Being a Republican white male should make one ineligible IMHO
They do too much damage to the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
23. Crooks and Liars had a big piece on it.
And I guess the macho men of this world are all repeating Huckabee's statement that women should submit to their husbands. And I suppose they should all wear, veils, burkas, and walk ten paces behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Great - I missed it when it was originally published
since I don't usually read the paper. A friend sent it to me knowing that I would be interested.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
25. And what about the Senator who was out with brain surgery?
This idiot doesn't seem to have a problem with that situation!

The man in question was out for months, and recently went back to work...

Full salary, and benefits...

And that was entirely appropriate, IMHO, too...

The male chauvinist letter-writer is living in the far-distant, dark, and horrifying past...

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malta blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. Ah yes Peggy -
I suppose since the senator was a man, it was just peachy for him to receive benefits.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #25
32. And let's not forget Strom
Strom Thurmond in his last years had no idea what was going on. He lived in a hospital and they rolled him out for votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
27. Fuck "Ron" - he's probably a disaffected Repuke.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
30. There's still a lot who think a woman shouldn't be seen in public
if she's pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
31. I don't mind that she's preggers, but she can't bring the baby to work.
The Constitution limits the House to 435 whining babies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
33. Idiot.
There are plenty of people in Congress who become ill from one thing or another. Does this idiot feel they should resign? After all chemo treatments take time away from constituents.

This is just sexist drivel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
35. I'm assuming RonXXX
will never be pregnant and has single-handedly managed to prove that pregnancy is not a prerequisite for stupidity. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DadOf2LittleAngels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
36. Depends.
If she gets something like hyperemesis gravidarum she should probably be treated as if she was in a coma..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
37. Ummmm What about all the campaiging Reps and Senators who aren't doing
their job in their offices?

Actually, I'd rather keep the pregnant ones and ditch the campaigners. I bet they would get a lot more done that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC