|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Marr
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:16 PM Original message |
Do you expect the primary vote to be rigged? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. Pretty damn tough to rig a caucus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. They will bring in mutant robots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. You ever seen a caucus? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
42. You ever seen an Iowan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frazzled
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Actually not: we never know what the popular vote (body count) is in Iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Tell that to Tom Vilsack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
2. Not in NH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
3. Regardless how they turn out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. I am sorry to say that without significant improvements and a return of verified inspections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zeemike
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. I am with you on all of that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
7. I expect that it will be attempted. With what success I cannot say. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gowexler
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
9. I expect it- you think they would leave something that important up to the American people? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kitty44
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
10. Yes. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just-plain-Kathy
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
11. I think the powers-that-be who put Bush in office TWICE will not give up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
12. Depends where, some places are easier to rig than others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
14. Yeah, kind of, unfortunately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
15. Funny how the California primary was moved up, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:01 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Funny how most states have moved up their primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kucinich4America
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:24 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Yes, but most states don't have a deciding number of votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 09:18 AM Response to Reply #22 |
28. New York and Illinios have more combined |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:49 AM Response to Reply #15 |
25. Secretary Bowen decertified them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Thu Dec-27-07 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
17. I don't even have to ASK that question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:03 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. How specifically did they rig it for Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Early primary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 09:03 AM Response to Reply #21 |
27. But Dennis Kucinich will be on the ballot with her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 11:47 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. He actually TRIED to get OFF of the ballot and Michigan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:02 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Kucinich did sign the paperwork to withdraw: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:13 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. The point is he wanted off the ballot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:09 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. No, the SOS put their names on the ballot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:13 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. The candidates, including Clinton and Dodd, PLEDGED to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:19 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. They pledged to not campaign or participate in the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Spoken like a true Clintonian. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. They did so because they were so freighted of possibly brusing the delecate egos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Guess it depends on what your definition of the word "pledge" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:44 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Has Senator Harkin or anyone else who asked the candidates to sign the pledge said anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:47 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Like Harkin would publicly upset Clintons applecart! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:59 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. YOU say that she is disregarding the agreement. I have yet to hear anyone who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:02 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Come to Michigan and listen to the ELECTORATE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Is the MI electorate angry at Senator Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:15 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:35 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. The I guess she she doesnt stand much of a chance in the primary against Kucinich and Gravel, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:39 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. That's the whole IDEA, isn't it, Freddie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:41 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. That's the whole IDEA, isn't it, Freddie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #21 |
40. But Michigan has zero delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:24 PM Response to Reply #40 |
47. The DLCers in Michigan are "betting their pinks" that their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 04:47 PM Response to Reply #17 |
71. PassingFair, a summary please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gowexler
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
19. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaLittle Kitty
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:15 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. TouchScreens Remain in Place for Pres Primary in Fl. Nuff Said! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #23 |
41. But who cares about Florida? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
24. Yes, deep down I do, however, without any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seriousstan
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:07 AM Response to Original message |
26. As always, only if my candidate doesn't win. Then the polls tell the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
30. No, I just expect someone to say it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
31. no. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
32. No, but I expect a plethora of tinfoil hat threads on DU suggesting that it was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:17 PM Response to Reply #32 |
43. Ditto |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fight Power
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #32 |
72. there is reason to believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
34. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
37. Yes, but not the caucus for obvious reasons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
38. EVERYTHING about America is rigged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:23 PM Response to Reply #38 |
45. I'm not a citizen...But I'm played as one on TeeVee... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
siri2k
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
48. Yes, as sure as night follows day... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
54. YES. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blues90
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
58. what isn't rigged , everything is a lie and rigged no matter what it is . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gowexler
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
59. We can't just watch this happen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
63. I've only suspected that the 2008 primary would be rigged for the last 4 years.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
64. The timing of it already is rigged to disenfranchise many college students... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stevepol
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
65. Bev Harris has investigated this problem & it's up on the BBV site. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TripleD
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
66. The Des Moines alresdy rigged it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace 2008
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 02:00 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. there are many more dirty tricks as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 04:45 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. yep, that was going to be my 2 cents worth. It's already been done. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace 2008
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
68. Hacking Democracy pt9 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Festivito
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
69. Not so much that it could not be properly won. (Unlikely though) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC