|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Ravy
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:34 PM Original message |
Please vote for John Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
1. I'll second that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
surfermaw
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 07:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
30. BUT>>BUT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. Okay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:02 PM Response to Reply #2 |
118. Wow. Just Wowsa. One of the best posts ever. Thanks Ravy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bryant69
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'd agree with this. I like Edwards a lot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. You've convinced me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
5. I am not completely set, but I am leaning towards Biden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 03:28 AM Response to Reply #5 |
74. What a wonderful reply to what was a great post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 10:55 AM Response to Reply #5 |
114. Nice post Marrah G.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:08 PM Response to Reply #114 |
122. Great stuff. Do I hear a Biden/Edwards or Edwards/Biden. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:43 PM Response to Reply #122 |
128. I'll take Biden on any ticket! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
6. I am. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 03:30 AM Response to Reply #6 |
75. I think he will aquart- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 11:46 AM Response to Reply #6 |
117. Kucinich Asked His Supporters To Get Behind Edwards Last Time Out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The River
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
7. Nice Post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Froward69
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
8. No Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. That is a point, but one that hasn't bothered me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Froward69
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. personaly I prefer Biden/Obama with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandyd921
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 06:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
21. Taking pro-bono cases is a bogus issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 06:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. You beat me to it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 11:19 PM Response to Reply #22 |
43. He beat me to it too, but that didn't stop me from posting my comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 11:28 PM Response to Reply #21 |
45. That is such a bunch of crap! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScooterFibby
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:24 AM Response to Reply #45 |
55. No, it is not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 03:37 AM Response to Reply #45 |
76. Could you tell us all about Bidens Pro Bono work? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wellstone dem
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
130. that is not true,there is plenty of opportunity for volunteering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacebaby3
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 12:48 AM Response to Reply #21 |
140. Not bogus. He could have done pro-bono work just as many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 08:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
32. What was he like without the camera in the room? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 10:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
40. He did his cases on contingency, I would bet you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandyd921
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 11:41 PM Response to Reply #40 |
50. That's how liability cases work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 01:04 AM Response to Reply #50 |
59. I know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:55 PM Response to Reply #50 |
131. Which is why the reward for the attorney is so big. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wellstone dem
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:57 PM Response to Reply #50 |
132. But PI attys don't take every case. They take the ones they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 11:17 PM Response to Reply #8 |
42. I think that's a red herring. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 06:13 AM Response to Reply #42 |
85. win and no lawyer fee? I'm no math expert, but that's how I'd put it together |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #85 |
126. Well, pro bono is for the indigent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 11:22 PM Response to Reply #126 |
138. fair point, but what if a settlement is 10k? 100k? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickernation
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:47 AM Response to Reply #8 |
58. you have to be kidding froward69. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 07:45 AM Response to Reply #58 |
98. Wow, stickernation! Zing!! That's gonna leave a mark. And welcome to DU!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 03:42 AM Response to Reply #8 |
77. I suppose that was you on the grassy knoll too, right? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 05:02 AM Response to Reply #8 |
82. Why should he take pro-bono cases? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:33 AM Response to Reply #8 |
105. There isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wellstone dem
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
129. That's what is bothering me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomg
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
9. Thanks for a great post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corkhead
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
10. when it became apparent that Gore was not jumping in, I decided on Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadesOfGrey
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 07:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. Same here. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 06:16 AM Response to Reply #10 |
86. Ok, there ought to be a rule that anyone who uses the word "electability" to justify their political |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corkhead
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 07:44 AM Response to Reply #86 |
97. I have been an idealist in my voting patterns for almost 30 years of voting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:24 AM Response to Reply #97 |
103. yeah, that's what we did in 2006 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
13. Edwards is my lean - and I think he is the most electable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 02:25 AM Response to Reply #13 |
66. Electability is not a fucking issue this time. whoever wins dem nom wins. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 03:07 AM Response to Reply #66 |
72. I think you overestimate the voters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 06:19 AM Response to Reply #66 |
87. you said it, so I don't have to! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #66 |
133. If you think the Dems have already won the White House regardless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
14. Number three is interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 03:03 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. That is exactly my fear as expressed in number 3. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kip Humphrey
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #16 |
44. No! The fascists' tools of Unitary Presidency must leave the office with Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
15. nice endorsement for your candidate but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 06:15 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Readily should not be read as rapidly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
17. I am a Kucinich supporter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tucsonlib
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 01:09 AM Response to Reply #17 |
61. Exactly Right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 10:53 AM Response to Reply #61 |
113. If you never vote your heart, then your heart never wins. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lugnut
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
18. Okay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GCP
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
19. I'll be voting for him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
23. Good post Ravy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike03
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
24. I like Edwards very much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stlsaxman
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 10:04 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. "Waste my primary vote"???? NO primary vote is wasted on any candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 06:24 AM Response to Reply #24 |
89. voting for anyone other than your favorite candidate is a waste of your primary vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corkhead
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 07:53 AM Response to Reply #89 |
99. it sounds like to me that he just doesn't want to further split the anti Hillary vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:25 AM Response to Reply #99 |
104. when we have a "no to x-candidate" option on the ballot, I'll accept that argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertRat
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
25. I'm voting my conscience in the primary, so I can't vote for Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2hip
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
26. He's already got my vote - here's a kick for the undecideds! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
28. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
29. I will consider it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
31. I really like that you asked nicely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waiting for hope
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
33. Already there - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FatDave
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
34. You got it Ravy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist
![]() |
Wed Jan-02-08 12:27 AM Response to Reply #34 |
142. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
35. Super Tuesday, I vote for John Edwards. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
37. Really like Edwards --- you're on! Of course, I still like Dennis, as well--!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
38. Kucinich Has My Primary Vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avenger64
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
39. I am. When the boom comes down on the economy ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
41. Never again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
46. Fortress funds - does that not even bother you a teeny-weeny bit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Froward69
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
47. Would you buy a car from this guy??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 11:37 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. I knew he looked familiar! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1corona4u
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 11:57 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. I won't vote for him... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wizard
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:02 PM Response to Reply #52 |
120. DId his father start in management? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Speed8098
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 06:43 AM Response to Reply #47 |
95. his never turning down 1/3 of the settlement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kermitt Gribble
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
48. I'm with you!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
51. More hypocrisy from Edwards ---- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 06:31 AM Response to Reply #51 |
91. I didn't even know Universities had "ironic spending" budgets! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corkhead
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 07:56 AM Response to Reply #51 |
101. I'll bet Biden ALWAYS speaks for free. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
youthere
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 10:56 AM Response to Reply #101 |
115. I am caucusing for Biden... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeFort III
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
53. I completely agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 07:55 AM Response to Reply #53 |
100. Welcome to DU, LeFort III. Go JRE!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:04 AM Response to Original message |
54. I appreciate your asking politely and he is in my top three now, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #54 |
137. Tomorrow is here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldgrowth
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
56. You got me thinking about it !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
57. Not in the primaries..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PakistaniDUer
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 01:05 AM Response to Original message |
60. I may in the general, but Kucinich has my vote noW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smokey nj
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 01:39 AM Response to Original message |
62. I'm already there! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cloudythescribbler
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 01:43 AM Response to Original message |
63. Interesting distribution of sympathies among the commenters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 06:34 AM Response to Reply #63 |
92. why would you not vote for someone whose platform you agree with? utter insanity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smalll
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 01:56 AM Response to Original message |
64. Well, your point #1 is false in regards to Edwards - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 02:27 AM Response to Reply #64 |
67. If he gets nominated, and that is all they have, I hope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smalll
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 02:35 AM Response to Reply #67 |
68. As a non-rich person, I WOULD prosper with a President John Edwards - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 06:36 AM Response to Reply #68 |
93. why would you assume he'd govern the way he talks? Better to look at what he voted for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gmudem
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 03:00 AM Response to Reply #64 |
71. That dirt is already out there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 02:16 AM Response to Original message |
65. I'll vote for Edwards...as Dennis Kucinich's VP. Edwards said this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BluePhildog
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 02:40 AM Response to Reply #65 |
69. Edwards is our best choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquaman
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 02:42 AM Response to Original message |
70. O'yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 03:07 AM Response to Original message |
73. R&K for Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 04:03 AM Response to Original message |
78. I agree with Edwards, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 04:12 AM Response to Original message |
79. Think strategy though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rch35
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 04:37 AM Response to Original message |
80. ill drink to that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 04:56 AM Response to Original message |
81. K&R. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 05:03 AM Response to Original message |
83. Most likely that's exactly what I will do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unrepentant Fenian
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 05:15 AM Response to Original message |
84. Count me in ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anniebelle
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 06:22 AM Response to Original message |
88. Your argument is going to win my vote for Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColesCountyDem
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 06:26 AM Response to Original message |
90. I'm convinced! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 06:41 AM Response to Original message |
94. "I do not believe in bashing the other candidates in order to make my candidate appear stronger." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yy4me
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
96. Got my vote and that of countless others. Can you imagine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeeDeeNY
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
102. I like him, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freedomofspeech
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
106. Great post.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 08:38 AM Response to Original message |
107. I'm leaning that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneGrassRoot
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
108. Classy, Ravy..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
109. I concur. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
110. No, but thank you for posting a post supporting your candidate rather than another attack thread\nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nradisic
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
111. I'm with you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madam Mossfern
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #111 |
112. I liked him a year ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wizard
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:14 PM Response to Reply #112 |
123. Working a government building and campaigning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madam Mossfern
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #123 |
125. Unfortunately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
116. I'm In... But I Have Been... Does That Count?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Th1onein
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
119. I will, don't worry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogmarch
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
121. I'm already in, but here's a K& R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stargleamer
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
124. I will. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sugar Smack
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
127. Oh hell yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bravo Zulu
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
134. I'm leaning toward voting for John Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
135. not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connonym
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
136. OK, since you asked nicely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prefer
![]() |
Sun Dec-30-07 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
139. Edwards has my vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Mon Dec-31-07 01:57 AM Response to Original message |
141. can't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC