|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
MNDemNY
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 06:46 PM Original message |
Blackwater turns down Bhutto Security contract. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 06:47 PM Response to Original message |
1. Prolly the first one they ever turned down, if true. I wonder why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. cause they knew she was going to be killed. there can't be any other reason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zabet
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 06:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Maybe they had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 06:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. There you go... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 08:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Exactly. Maybe Blackwater killed her. They aren't mercenaries for nothing! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. Conflict of interest, Blackwater style. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amacd
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 04:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Who, and why might they, might tell Blackwater to back away? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 06:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Deleted message |
judaspriestess
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 10:25 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. "secrets that everyone knows": |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 08:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Conflict of interest? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 09:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. The possibilities are endless, and believable. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 09:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. My first thought exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. Too dangerous for them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
judaspriestess
![]() |
Fri Dec-28-07 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
12. so is all this so the US can get its hands on the nuclear weapons? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug
![]() |
Sat Dec-29-07 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
14. Conflict of interest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC