Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iowa Could Make or Break Democrats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:34 AM
Original message
Iowa Could Make or Break Democrats
By BETH FOUHY and NEDRA PICKLER
The Associated Press
Saturday, December 29, 2007; 9:31 AM

DES MOINES, Iowa -- Iowa could make or break a Democratic candidate on Thursday. The question is, who?

While the state has long played a key role in choosing the Democratic presidential nominee, it has unparalleled influence this year, even after several larger states moved up their contests to try and muscle in. Those efforts have done little more than compress the calendar into a five-week sprint that ends with the multistate primary Feb. 5 _ strengthening Iowa's position as the leadoff caucus state rather than diminishing it.

Even New Hampshire, which holds the first primary of the season, has seen its once-mighty position diminished somewhat by Iowa's outsized role this time.

Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards are locked in a tight three-way contest in Iowa just days before voters attend their precinct caucuses on Thursday. And while all three have strong organizations in other early states, the best laid plans in those places could come apart depending on what happens in Iowa.

Only Obama and Clinton have raised enough campaign cash to be sure of being competitive through Feb. 5 and beyond. Edwards has agreed to accept federal matching funds, which will constrain the amount of money he is allowed to spend in each state.

more >>>

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/29/AR2007122900675.html

Looks like I need to re-open my wallet for Edwards! Will do that now... $20.08 happy new year!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. You know
This just makes me think we need tighter campaign finance laws. Maybe a maximum spend law and a new garaunteed media access law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Throwing the constitution out with bath water is no solution. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. "It's just a god damned piece of paper"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-30-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. uhm
how is garaunteeign our government is run by the wealthiest good for the constitution.

I'm all for free speech, but we do have to make sure more voices are heard. Arguing for corporate controlled media and campaign processes hardly seems to be a good argument democratically or constitutionally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm afraid Obama's going to take a nose-dive.
the media, the polls, and a couple of trip-ups are trending against his favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. Iowa will make or break most of the candidates.
It does not make any difference if they are Democrat or Republican. People want to ride the coat tails of a winner so the leaders will pick up momentum. If you are less than number three the odds are against you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I thought the title of the article was a bit odd to say Democrats instead of Candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. The "Expectations Game" is in full gear.
TELL people what to think ... fuck "listening"!

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC