|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 08:44 PM Original message |
While I'm no fan of Hillary . . . I do note the NY Times today, front page --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneMoreDemocrat (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. The usual NY TImes treatment of females...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I think they mean 'women'. 'Females' includes dogs, cats, trees...but you are right about the NYT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. No ... I mean females --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 10:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. "Women" suggests a female of some age --- FEMALE doesn't --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-21-08 07:49 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. 'Females' is not exclusive to humans and is seen as insulting. 'Girls' are always specified.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-21-08 07:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. So . . . we can't use the term "Male" either . . . because that's the opposite --- ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-21-08 08:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Who thought up this nonsense . . . ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. You never noticed how females are invisible to the NY Times? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-21-08 07:51 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. It's also the way they are visible. There's a rebellion going on in the Book Review section... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
3. Why is the media allowed to control elections in this country? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-20-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Right . . . !! And, I don't know that we can argue that CLINTON should have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-21-08 12:03 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. You're correct. There's no doubt in my mind corporations are controlling our elections..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC