|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:29 PM Original message |
exactly why are Congresspeople required to be physically |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:31 PM Original message |
You're kidding, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. why is it a joke to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. We need to give them another reason NOT to show up for work? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. actually I'm thinking it cuts out excused for missing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:48 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. BWHAHAHA! You always crack me up, MF! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:53 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. It's not physical labor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 05:07 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. It would be "WORK" if they got paid $30,000 a year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I'll just second what you said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 07:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. that's unnecessary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 05:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. Series. They'd all be as huge as Hastert if they were allowed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sutz12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. Yeah, I'm sure Diebold can design a machine that will work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
5. How would you confirm that it's actually them voting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
6. Because we don't have embedded identification chips yet... eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:13 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC