Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Louisiana parish reconsiders ban on soothsaying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:41 AM
Original message
Louisiana parish reconsiders ban on soothsaying
Nice to see that our governing authorities are finally dealing with some important issues. This is quite progressive for Livingston parish.


http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/14303657.html


LIVINGSTON — The Livingston Parish Council called Thursday night for a public hearing on repealing its soothsaying ordinance.

The council also unanimously named Jimmie McCoy as council chairman for 2008 and discussed the practice of taking private gravel roads into the parish system, then paying to blacktop those roads.

Council attorney Blayne Honeycutt recommended the council repeal the parish‘s fortunetelling ordinance, which has been challenged in federal court by a Wiccan minister.

Fortunetelling has been a “nonissue” in the parish, Honeycutt said in recommending the ordinance’s repeal.

Councilman Randy Rushing, who said the ordinance is “not going to hold up” in court, made the motion to hold a hearing on the proposal to repeal the ordinance, which the council enacted last year.

Rushing’s proposal was approved on a 5-2 vote, with Eddie Wagner and Thomas Watson voting against introduction of the change.
The public hearing will be held during the council’s next meeting at 6 p.m. Feb. 11.

In voting on officers for the new year, the council chose McCoy, a Watson resident who is beginning his second term in office, as its new chairman.

He succeeds Albert “Buddy” Mincey, who was unanimously elected as vice chairman for 2008.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. I know a LOT of people who take such things seriously.
This is a good ruling, IMO, regardless of my personal opinion on such things, which I, by necessity, generally keep to myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I really don't mean to mock the Wiccans...The ridiculous thing is that
the ban was ever passed in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. True enough...
The reason behind such rulings, usually, is to prevent people from being scammed by bunco artists who use soothsaying as a way to get deep into the lives and wallets of potential victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC