Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House ‘Reprimanded Swiss Ambassador’ For Delivering 2003 Iranian Offer For Negotiations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 06:14 PM
Original message
White House ‘Reprimanded Swiss Ambassador’ For Delivering 2003 Iranian Offer For Negotiations
Edited on Mon Feb-26-07 06:16 PM by RedEarth
In an interview with Democracy Now, Trita Parsi — former congressional aide to ex-Rep. Bob Ney (R-OH) — disclosed more details about his recent revelation that an Iranian offer for negotiations with the Bush administration was delivered to senior political adviser Karl Rove in 2003.

According to Parsi, Rove confirmed receipt of the Iranian offer two hours after it was delivered to him, calling it “intriguing.” Subsequently, Parsi claims there was a “discussion about this at the highest level in the Bush administration.” Hard-liners, led by Dick Cheney, immediately rejected it, even going so far as “reprimand the Swiss ambassador for having delivered it.”

Parsi echoed the criticisms of former NSC official Flynt Leverett, who has said that Condoleezza Rice — then National Security Adviser — saw the offer. Rice now says, “I don’t know what Flynt Leverett’s talking about.” Weighing in on the dispute, Parsi said, “I find it highly unlikely that they did not see it. I frankly believe that it’s beyond unlikely that they didn’t see.”



http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/26/parsi-iran-offer/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, do you know what Hercules did to Lichas,
when Lichas delivered the death garment?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. double negitives confuse me---but now I get it.
I frankly believe that it’s beyond unlikely that they didn’t see.”.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Right, Condi didn't see it, 'forgot' about the 16 words, etc., etc.
Useless, useless woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madhoosier Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. I just saw the interview
I liked Parsi's comparison that in 2003 the Bush administration refused to negotiate because they were negotiating from a position of strength. Now in 2007 the Bush administration is refusing to negotiate with Iran because they would have to negotiate from a position of weakness. The simple truth is that no matter what, the Bush administration is not going to seek a negotiated settlement to the hoped for military confrontation with Iran.

As a second point I'm now more sure that the leak to Ahmed Chalabi that the NSA had broken Iran's diplomatic code and was reading all of Iran's diplomatic correspondence between Tehran and her Embassies was no accident. Had the intelligence pros in State, the CIA and elsewhere through the government had continued access to this window into the heart of Iran's government the administration's case for war with Iran would have been an impossible sell inside the intelligence community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC