Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"MONEY TALKS" IN THE SENATE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:34 AM
Original message
"MONEY TALKS" IN THE SENATE
It's been a rough winter. We're heading into a recession, and oil prices keep going up and up. $103 per barrel and nearly $4 a gallon as of today. So, why wouldn't our Senators end oil subsidies and increase funding for clean energy?

As the old saying goes, "money talks". That's why it was so encouraging last week when the House of Representatives passed a bill that would put an end to $17 billion in subsidies given to the oil industry over 10 years. Instead, the money would be used for tax credits for renewable energy sources and energy efficient technologies. This bill is an important step towards fighting global warming and creating a clean energy-independent America, but it still faces heavy opposition in the Senate. The Senate has killed a bill like this before- and they might do it again unless we stop them.

We need our elected officials to stand up for the good of the people-not Big Oil. Please urge your Senator to move beyond the shortsighted interests of Big Oil.

It is preposterous that Congress continues to use taxpayer dollars to subsidize the most powerful and profitable industry on Earth. Unfortunately, it may come as no surprise that members of the Senate also take on average twice the amount of money from Big Oil than members in the House.

We need a true Separation of Oil and State. We can't afford to have members of Congress who put the money interests of Big Oil ahead of the interest of the people. Please take a stand and tell your Senator to support clean energy today.
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizations/oilchange/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=23460&t=wide.dwt



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. THANKS! for giving this important issue high visibility with kicks and recs n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. So how is amnesty for the telecoms going?
Just part of the same thing. Subsidies for oil billionaires, Pinochet protective laws for criminals corporations, immunity from the Constitution for dictators, Does it get any more obvious than this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. instead of debating FISA why isn't the House debating USA Patriot Act?...
The law was temporary security measure passed on 9/12. It was 128 pages long. Was it ready prior to that date?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush* will veto it anyway and we all know "The Votes aren't There"
Not one single time in over a Decade has Bush* or the Republicans done a single thing for the American people that didn't benefit Corporations first and formost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. yeah, who needs the House of Representitives...
They're so unpredictable, even - dare I say - occasionally doing the will of the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. I was expecting a thread about Duke Cunningham.



:shrug:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. naa, Duke is still in a cushy federal facility that passes as a prison, isn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC