|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:00 PM Original message |
Spitzer question: Who ordered the wiretap? FISA smear? Siegelman 2.0? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimshoes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. Obviously everybody is being monitored for everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egalitariat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Maybe he got it back when he was investigating the ring. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Thanks for weighing in. I can't help it - I just can't help but wonder. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 09:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. Axe or no axe, I hope they just clean the decks already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. That's sure as hell what I'm thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
4. from an earlier post by KPETE, here's how ist's done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Thanks - and thanks for the link also! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:25 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. to me this proves that they're using wiretapping for activities other than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Well, are Paterson's priorities and his pet agenda items the same as Spitzer's? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 11:37 PM Response to Reply #9 |
26. Paterson is a very good man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 06:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
32. "using wiretapping for activities other than monitoring terrorists" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. forgive me for asking but how do hookers link into terrorists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Well, aren't they wiretapping EVERYTHING? Just in case? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Why can't Nancy Asleepatthewheel Pelosi see this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Truly. The CONS are the guys about whom the phrase "dirty tricksters" was coined. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 06:35 PM Response to Reply #16 |
29. agreed that Spitzer transgressed but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. All we need to remember is THIS IS A BUSH ADMINISTRATION |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 06:57 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. yes, and so our justice system is tainted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #16 |
36. Yes, and then there is the threat factor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 06:10 PM Response to Reply #14 |
28. That's a good one! Nancy Asleepatthewheel. Sure fits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 06:37 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. any Speaker of the House that could not bring impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 07:19 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. No KIDDING!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-12-08 06:55 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. yes, that's why I think that the Spitzer example is so memorable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wain (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:30 PM Response to Original message |
10. I can't help but think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
12. spitzer has so many political enemies, i can only assume he's a dumbass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
13. i thought there was an ongoing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 07:42 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Maybe there was but I am still waiting for the trial of DeLay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Born_A_Truman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 08:17 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Turns out, his bank contacted the feds... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 06:51 PM Response to Reply #17 |
33. I have news for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 09:48 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. That's exactly right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojorabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 11:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
24. I read in another thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
20. Which occurred first? The wiretap or the "prostitution ring" investigation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thepricebreaker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
21. The FBI - He so happened to get caught on the tap... You are paranoid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
22. I had the same thought. They could easily monitor every Dems calls and then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluesmail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
23. shades of the Schwarzennegar recall against Grey Davis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BurtWorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-10-08 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
25. It would only be Siegelman 2.0 if Spitzer weren't actually guilty of any crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 06:09 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Don't get me wrong. I'm not suggesting he's completely, or even minimally innocent here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
31. Not paranoid--you're a realist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adenoid_Hynkel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
37. he's still a dumbass and needs to go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:54 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC