|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:14 AM Original message |
Could Someone Explain To Me Why I Should Be Pissed About Telecom Immunity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burythehatchet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
1. hoo boy ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
2. Depends on which profile you fit into |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
3. Who's popping the popcorn? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:19 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Solly, here ya go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:20 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Thank you, OmmmSweetOmmm!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:22 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. ...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:20 AM Response to Reply #3 |
11. LOL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:26 AM Response to Reply #11 |
23. hehe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoneOffShore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 10:30 AM Response to Reply #23 |
42. Coffee ? We don't need no stinking coffee!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bryant69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
4. Well do you think the President should be above the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boobooday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
5. Perhaps because it represents a behind the scenes collusion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:21 AM Response to Reply #5 |
16. that's kinda what I'm asking booboo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boobooday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:25 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Well, I think it is safe to say that all your emails have been filtered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 10:26 AM Response to Reply #21 |
40. If by filter you mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boobooday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 10:59 AM Response to Reply #40 |
49. I was being cautious, too lazy to verify the extent of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #49 |
52. You can't verify the extent of it.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:42 AM Response to Reply #16 |
30. your e-mails have beecn scanned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 10:17 AM Response to Reply #30 |
39. it's not that I don't have a problem with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notadmblnd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 10:43 AM Response to Reply #39 |
44. Oh I know. this place has changed quite a bit over the past few years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrat 4 Ever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 10:50 AM Response to Reply #16 |
46. Well, on my phone I have discussed personal health issues with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:45 AM Response to Reply #5 |
31. ...and it is one more highly significant step in curtailing our Constitutional rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
6. It's about upholding the constitution, which affects us all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
7. Because you have a right to privacy and the Government has no right to invade it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
8. It appears that illegal and willful violations of civil liberties by corporations is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:24 AM Response to Reply #8 |
18. onh come on BHP in the old days here at DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:25 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. That fact that you don't understand the issue speaks volumes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:28 AM Response to Reply #20 |
27. yea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:31 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. You come on all aggressive saying "Why am I SUPPOSED to be pissed" demanding an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
10. That would be an expost facto law and that's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 10:36 AM Response to Reply #10 |
43. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #43 |
53. They can't make a law retroactive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
12. It's a cover up of high crimes committed by Bush/Cheney... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Botany (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
14. Because it lets bush & Cheney "walk away" from their crimes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gidney N Cloyd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:27 AM Response to Reply #14 |
25. Yup. The pre-9/11 tapping is the key point for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freedom fighter jh (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
15. It could wipe out your right against unlawful searches and protect the Bush admin from justice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
19. because when we allow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
22. No, I don't think I would be able to explain it to you. Next time, read the boards before posting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
24. thanks to all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:28 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Why, you and your beautiful mind are quite welcome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:30 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. thanks for waving goodbye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoFlaJet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
32. I'm really glad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durablend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:53 AM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Yes, you're right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #32 |
54. Ignorance is bliss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
33. That would depend upon what you don't want them to do to you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fredda Weinberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
34. Reading between the proverbial lines, I'm not. The telcoms were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
35. how's this....immunity is for criminals...no crime, no immunity needed eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sabriel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
36. Would you like your insurance and health care providers to have immunity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
38. The US government cannot monitor your telecommunications without a WARRANT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TransitJohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
41. Because it will prevent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
45. You have a constitutional right to be free from unreasonable search. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
47. discovery in the lawsuits will reveal the wiretapping of the Kerry Campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
48. Well, in that case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
50. because it's unconstitutional to pass a law after the fact. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-14-08 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
51. Not really. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC