|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 05:24 PM Original message |
I wish the primaries were on the same day in every state. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
etherealtruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. I share that wish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. is there a special reason they aren't? I've always wondered why they stagger them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corkhead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 06:24 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. keeps the selection in the hands of the power brokers and their handmadens the press, not the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nite Owl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
2. I do too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. k&r in agreement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EdwardM (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
5. I see two sides to this issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 05:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. well by the time it gets around to us in Ca. it's almost a done deal which really sucks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 06:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Same here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meldroc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 05:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. I can think of a couple solutions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjornsdotter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
8. Same here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geardaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
9. K&R'd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
10. That would STRONGLY favor wealthier candidates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 05:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. that's true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bobbieo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 05:56 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Arizona's is in September - think of the money that could be saved if it was held in June!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 06:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Dark horses don't stand a chance with a front-loaded primary system. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crabby Appleton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
13. me too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
14. That would be a logistical nightmare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
16. I don't! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suziedemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
19. All Primaries on the same day - but multiple primaries to narrow the field in stages. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheFarseer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
20. I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 10:37 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. that a good point, also the sooner the presumptive nominee is picked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:25 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC