Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hmmm... Interesting Stuff Here...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 02:10 PM
Original message
Hmmm... Interesting Stuff Here...
<snip>

Jane Akre spent 20 years as a network and local TV reporter for news and mass media operations throughout the country. Recently, she and her husband, investigative reporter Steve Wilson, were awarded the Goldman Environmental Prize for their struggle with the story told in this chapter.

By February 1997 our story was ready to air. It attempted to answer some troubling questions: Why had Monsanto sued two small dairies to prevent them from labeling their milk as coming from cows not injected with ? Why had two Canadian health regulators claimed that their jobs were threatened—and then said Monsanto offered them a bribe to give fast-track approval to the drug? Why did Florida supermarkets break their much-publicized promise that milk in the dairy case would not come from hormone-treated cows “until it gained widespread acceptance?" And why was the US the only major industrialized nation to approve this controversial genetically engineered hormone? (p. 211)

Station managers were so proud of our work that they saturated virtually every Tampa Bay radio station with thousands of dollars’ worth of ads urging viewers to watch what we’d uncovered about “The Mystery in Your Milk.” But then, our Fox managers’ pride turned to panic. John Walsh wrote that some points of the story “clearly contain the elements of defamatory statements which, if repeated in a broadcast, could lead to serious damage to Monsanto and dire consequences for Fox News.” (pp. 211-213)

It was not long after our struggle to air an honest report had begun that Fox fired both the news director and the general manager. The new general manager, Dave Boylan, explained that if we didn’t agree to changes that Monsanto and Fox lawyers were insisting upon, we’d be fired for insubordination within 48 hours. We pleaded with Dave to look at the facts we’d uncovered, many of which conclusively disproved Monsanto’s claims. We reminded him of the importance of the facts about a basic food most of our viewers consume and feed to their children daily. His reply: “We paid $3 billion dollars for these TV stations. We’ll tell you what the news is. The news is what we say it is!” Steve was firm but respectful when he made it clear we would neither lie nor distort any part of the story. (pp. 213-215)

The Dairy Coalition’s director took great pride in bragging that the Coalition “snowed the station with paperwork and pressure to have the story killed.” Fox threatened our job every time we resisted the dozens of changes that would sanitize the story and fill it with lies and distortions. Forest finally leveled with us. “You guys don’t get it. It doesn’t matter whether the facts are true. This story isn’t worth a couple of hundred thousand dollars to go up against Monsanto.” (pp. 217, 218)

Fox’s general manager presented us with an agreement that would give us a full year of salaries and benefits worth $200,000 in no-show “consulting jobs,” but with strings attached: no mention of how Fox covered up the story and no opportunity to ever expose the facts Fox refused to air. We turned down this second hush money offer. We were both finally fired, allegedly for “no cause.”
(p. 219)

The controversy over rBGH has traveled recently to Canada and the European Union, both of which decided to reject the drug for use in those countries. (p. 236)

<snip>

Link: http://www.wanttoknow.info/massmedia#akre

Which is from here: http://www.wanttoknow.info/mediacover-up

And that came from here: http://www.wanttoknow.info/

My mom turned me on to this. WillyT says... check it out!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R --
What always flummoxes me, is there are PEOPLE running these companies. What happened to their souls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Their souls have holes in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. This story has been around for a while about how Fox claims the rights to define the truth...
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 03:07 PM by calipendence
... the way they want to.

If you want more on this, you might try tuning to Link TV now if you have satellite TV. Just in the last hour or so they aired "The Corporation" which had a big segment where they talk to Jane Akre and others involved in this incident, and you can get a more in depth treatment of it and how it relates back to the flawed corporate charters we have these days that claim so many rights that they shouldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
selador Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. ANY private news business (or govt. run news )
has that same right, and often exercises it. that's why there is no such thing as unbiased news. it's a practical impossibility.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. And then later ...


American Journalists Win Top Eco-Award for Cow Hormone Story ... Monday, April 23, 2001


And rightfully so.

Link: http://www.commondreams.org/headlines01/0423-03.htm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. k&r. . . . . . . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. “We paid $3 billion dollars for these TV stations. We’ll tell you what the news is."
Say it all. Completely FAUX and F**ked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Response: We paid many millions of American lives for our democracy! Faux News E$AD!!!
Edited on Sat Mar-29-08 04:06 PM by calipendence
WE THE PEOPLE get to define how our truth is given to us, NOT those who try to bribe off our government!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think I saw this on 60 minutes. Sounds familiar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-29-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. watch "The Corporation" (which covers their story) and "The Future of Food"
http://www.popmatters.com/film/reviews/c/corporation-2004.shtml

THE CORPORATION
Directors: Jennifer Abbott, Mark Achbar
Cast: Jane Akre, Ray Anderson, Maude Barlow, Noam Chomsky, Milton Freidman, Naomi Klein, Michael Moore, Vandana Shiva, Steve Wilson
(Zeitgeist Films, 2004) Rated: Not rated
Release date: 4 June 2004 (limited)

by Cynthia Fuchs
PopMatters Film and TV Editor

Advertising and sponsorship have always been about using imagery to equate products with positive cultural or social experiences.
— Naomi Klein

these people, there's no such thing as enough.
— Michael Moore

Corporations make money. Whatever the costs, however it's done. A corporation, as Milton Friedman notes, can't be morally accountable or emotionally sentient, any more than a building might be. And yet, a corporation has been legally assigned the rights of a person.

This historical development is the point of departure for The Corporation, a clever, well-wrought, entertaining examination of the ways corporations work. When corporations were designated legal "individuals" (via the Fourteenth Amendment, originally designed, of course, to grant human rights to former slaves), they were granted rights to make claims and legal arguments to protect themselves and their property. The film argues that today, corporations are the planet's dominant institution, such that their welfare, as individuals, takes precedence over all else.

Based on co-producer Joel Bakan's book, The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power, the documentary compiles a range of interviews, with supporters as well as interrogators and opponents of corporations, economists (Friedman); academics (Elaine Bernard of Harvard University argues against corporations' legal capacity to own and sell everything); CEOs (Goodyear Tire chairman Sam Gibara); historians (Howard Zinn); reporters (Jane Akre and Steve Wilson, who blew the whistle on Fox News' efforts to repress their story on the dangers posed by Monsanto's synthetic bovine growth hormone rBGH); media activists (Michael Moore, who revisits his encounters with Nike CEO Phil Knight); a corporate spy (Marc Barry) who feels no guilt over his chosen profession; a feminist seed activist, Dr. Vandana Shiva, who observes the senselessness of the "suicide gene" that assures seeds become unusable after expiry dates); and a spokesperson for Disney's Celebration, Andrea Finger, who insists, smiling, "The Disney brand speaks of reassurance, it speaks of tradition, it speaks of quality."

..snip

The film provides another framework by which to measure the effectiveness and effects of corporations, the diagnostic criteria of the World Health Organization and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Partly funny and patently absurd, the evaluation takes legal language on its face, submitting that if a corporation is legally "a person," it might be expected to behave like one, too. Narrated by Mikéla J. Mikael, the film proceeds to check off DSM-IV categories in which corporations exhibit what can only be termed extreme disorder (they are deceitful, callous, amoral, unable to maintain relationships, can't feel guilt or remorse), examining "case studies" of corporations' injurious behaviors (polluting the environment, exploiting workers in sweat shops, valuing profits over lives, as when commodities broker Carlton Brown reports Wall Street traders' responses to the abrupt rise in gold prices as the Twin Towers fell on 9/11).

The documentary includes testimonies and opinions from well known activist scholars like Noam Chomsky, who points out a shift in corporations' historical purpose (in the olden days, corporations were entrusted to "serve the public good") or Zinn (A People's History of the United States), who notes the connections between the rise of European fascism and corporate structures. Edwin Black (IBM and the Holocaust) argues further that Nazi accounting systems were aided by early punch-card machines, at which point an IBM VP, Irving Wladawsky-Berger, appears to say, essentially, that a company is not responsible for uses of its product. Ray Anderson, the CEO of Interface, the world's largest commercial carpet manufacturer, takes a different view, asserting that businesses must be liable to their social and physical environments, publicly promoting the concept of sustainability.

Corporations are implicated as well in the ongoing and increasingly global drive to patent, own, and sell everything from DNA to water (the film's example here is the Coalition in Defense of Water and Life, a Bolivian anti-water privatization activist organization, which agitated against the privatization, costing one demonstrator's life). Benefiting from this drive in particular are resourceful students Chris Barrett and Luke McCabe, who convinced a bank to "sponsor" their $40,000 college tuitions, then went on to market their arrangement with assorted television appearances.

Given the film's premise, that corporations are by definition deceitful and self-sustaining (like sharks, perfect machines), an examination of public relations and marketing is to be expected. Naomi Klein (No Logo), for instance, contends that "branding is the new production," and moreover, today, "All relationships are commercial," mediated through self-images premised on brands. Product placement in movies or tv is old hat; nowadays, the more sophisticated and all-pervasive method is to insure products are visible and available at every moment -- you see someone on the sidewalk extolling the virtues of a new drink, or someone on the subway who endorses a new CD -- such seemingly innocuous instances provoke purchases.

..snip

— 15 July 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-30-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Video links...
Edited on Sun Mar-30-08 12:21 PM by Viva_La_Revolution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC