Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Panel urges changes to structure of reserves

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 12:38 PM
Original message
Panel urges changes to structure of reserves
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/03/TNScommission070301/

Panel urges changes to structure of reserves

By William H. McMichael - Staff writer
Posted : Thursday Mar 1, 2007 10:55:15 EST

A healthier and more effective National Guard and reserves will require substantial changes in coordination between federal and state officials and improved overall organizational structure, a congressionally appointed commission concludes in a report released today in Washington.

Among its most striking recommendations, the commission proposes that the Defense Department develop protocols that would allow state governors to direct the efforts of federal military assets — active-duty forces based in their states — to augment the National Guard in responding to an emergency such as a natural disaster.

“We spend a tremendous amount of time identifying, analyzing and documenting the problem,” said Arnold Punaro, chairman of the Commission on the National Guard and Reserves. “We came up with a cumulative set of regulations that would have a profound effect on the way that we’re able to respond to man-made or natural disasters as quickly as possible.

“Our findings show we are not sufficiently prepared now,” Punaro said. “The cause is all the shortcomings we have in all the institutions involved.”

The 13-member commission was established by Congress in 2005 with a mandate to assess the U.S. reserve components and recommend changes to ensure the National Guard and the reserves are “organized, trained, equipped, compensated and supported to best meet the needs of U.S. national security.”

The role of the reserve components has changed dramatically since Sept. 11, 2001, Punaro said. During the Cold War, he said, “They weren’t designated to be used on moment’s notice,” but both were used “a lot” during the first Gulf War and have been used “almost continuously” since Sept. 11.

“But saying that they’re operational doesn’t make them operational,” he said.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Reserve bases are primarily Pentagon pork
A political plum designed to give the local Representative something to brag about protecting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC