Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge To Address Jury At 4:30pm + Update

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:07 PM
Original message
Judge To Address Jury At 4:30pm + Update
Edited on Thu Mar-01-07 04:31 PM by Me.
*BREAKING* There is a note from the jury the content of which we don't know yet. We also heard that the judge is going to address the jury at 4:30 pm today in the courtroom, and it is assumed he will dismiss them for the day. We don't know whether the two things are related or not, but Marcy will be liveblogging it as it happens. — JH

Link added: http://www.firedoglake.com/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. tick-tock
tick-tock
tick-tock
tick-tock


Wonder how this settles with Scooter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. There was a description of Scooter in fdl today - can't remember which topic.
Short version - a pasted-on broad smile in public at all times, but a glimpse of a stressed look at one point in the courtroom.

FDL's servers must have gotten slammed about 4:20 or so - I gave up trying to read more comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. I can't imagine. Having been sooo in control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks
I want that Guilty so fast. Sadly tomorrow will be all Anna again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The Anna coverage
hit a pathetic low earlier today .... of course, I am guessing, because I do not watch it for more than :30 seconds .... but one MSNBC person asked Rita Cosby about the hurried efforts to arrange the funeral, and Rita said, "It's a giant undertaking..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. That's my fear for tomorrow
Edited on Thu Mar-01-07 04:18 PM by malaise
No doubt the Anna funeral will outdo Gerald Ford.:puke:

Rita is seriously ill as in mad.

Add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. You tuned it out too soon
At the end of that segment the reporter who was reporting about the court happenings about the funeral ended her segment by saying, with a big, welcoming smile to boot, "We still have parentage, custody, and money to look forward to." I took that as a signal that they were NEVER going to let this story go. Reminded me of the Baby M story so many years ago too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. One morning,
Imus suggested the "journalists" covering the ANS story be put to sleep. I can't force myself to watch the reporting on the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I rarely agree with Imus these days
but I have to agree with him on this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. More Courtroom Haps
Edited on Thu Mar-01-07 04:15 PM by Me.
"David Shuster of MSNBC is reporting:

We have been advised, and I have just confirmed, that the courthouse cafeteria is now flooded. And I can report that some type of liquid has created large puddles on the cafeteria floor, in the area where food is served. More significantly, the bathrooms next to the cafeteria have signs on the doors that say "closed." In other words, it is not a "cafeteria flood" as we had been led to believe, but rather a "bathroom flood" affecting the cafeteria.

This could impact the Libby jury in a crucial way: Every afternoon, around this time, the cafeteria workers will deliver "cookies" up to the jury room. Today, unless somebody has waders, or unless the jury is actively seeking a "mistrial via salmonella," there will be no cookie delivery.

This is not exactly the tough love we had been hoping the judge would impose on this jury to get them to reach a verdict. But, it is a start.

Reports that the bathroom discharge problems were caused by reporters/producers at A Network That Shall Not Be Named have not been confirmed.

We tried to get Shuster to tell us what network he was referring to in the final line, but he refused to confirm and mumbled something cryptic about "nobody you watch."

FDL: http://www.firedoglake.com/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Sean? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Falafel Boy?
Either of the two, both are so full of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. LOL
Would that be Fux?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Wasn't it just the other day, they lost electricity there
And more than half the courthouse was without power and people stuck in elevators. Good grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. What I'd give to be stuck in an elevator with PATRICK FITZGERALD.
:loveya: :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Never thought about that
That is so funny. Love your sense of humor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. What do you mean?
I was being serious!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
37. LOL. David Shuster sounds like he's going a little stir-crazy.
At least WE don't have to be within 15 minutes of Prettyman while we wait.

David: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. Fridays are a big day for jury verdict returns too.
Just FYI. Not necessarily relevant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. True
Jurors usually don;t like to finish jury service and go right back to work the next day. They typically like to have a weekend afterwards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. Further Update On Jury
This is looking like we may not get a verdict until next week:

"Word up on the jury request–the jury has asked to leave tomorrow at 2 to attend to some issues they can't attend to over the weekend. Walton granted it. But there is apparently one more thing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsmesgd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. per FDL: the jury asked for a dictionary, judge said no
Edited on Thu Mar-01-07 04:46 PM by itsmesgd
Judge said that if they had a question, they should ask him. He then sent them home for the night. Be back tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. It Is About The Dictionary
and why they can't have one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. The Latest From Jane
"From Jane:

Pach and I just got back from the courtroom. The jury is having a high old time together. They were to a one grinning from ear to ear, giggling, having the time of their lives. Pach noted that none of them looked at Libby, and they did not seem like a group of people who were in disharmony — there wasn't one who was hanging back, nobody was pissed at somebody who was intractable. They seemed to be thoroughly enjoying the process.

As Pach and I were heading to the elevators, I told him that I suspected that the thing that was happening to the jury is what happened to people on the blogs who got into this story — they got addicted to it. They're busy sorting through the details, peeling back layers of the onion, fascinated by the process of mutual discovery as they explore the characters and events that led up to the trial. Pach said in his shrinky expert opinion that this made a lot of sense.

I didn't get the feeling we're getting out of here any time soon."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. I love this line
Pach noted that none of them looked at Libby

"To Kill a Mockingbird" fans will understand my quiet glee. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Yep. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dancingme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Whenever a jury votes guilty they don't look at the defendant
in almost every case when they are led into the courtroom for the verdict to be read if it is guilty they don't look at the defendant. The OJ jurors looked at OJ and smiled as they went into the courtroom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
47. That's not accurate
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. Eventually the jury will deliver justice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I won't be holding my breath
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. me either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. From The Nation
“The below dispatch was filed on Thursday morning. On Thursday afternoon, Judge Reggie Walton called the attorneys for the government and the defense in the Libby trial into court. Why? The jury had sent him two requests. The jurors asked if they could cut out early on Friday at 2:00 pm. They also asked for a dictionary. The judge said yes to the Friday escape. He said no to the dictionary, explaining to the jury that if they had any questions about the definition of any word used in the instructions or the evidence they should consult with him, not a dictionary.

The meaning of all this? The jury is plowing ahead. And the jurors seem to be presuming they will not be done on Friday. As the judge said to the lawyers, "I assume they will not have a verdict tomorrow." But they are not yet stuck. Most of the jurors actually looked happy when they appeared in court. They did not appear frustrated, fed-up or upset. So the bottom-line hunch: they have a plan for reviewing the evidence and rendering a verdict--and there will be no resolution until next week.” Cont….

“So what do these two notes mean? They suggest the jury is still hard at work, in the weeds, plodding through the details of the case--after six days of deliberation. The eleven jurors--one juror was booted because she came into contact with outside information on the case--are even on to their second easel pad. From that you can draw your own conclusions. I'm not making any guesses.”


http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames?bid=3&pid=170795



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. Speaking of post-it notes - anyone know if the jury's notes, etc., are destroyed?
What a historical treasure those notes would be, especially if the verdict is guilty.

(My guess is that they go into a shredder and all we get are the verdict forms.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
26. Is Tomorrow A Fake-Out?
IMHO. they've had enough time to come up with a decision. How can they anticipate that they still won't be able to reach a verdict tomorrow? According to accounts they seem to be a very together group. In addition, everyone has been judging whether a verdict is close by the way the jurors are dressed. So tomorrow they want to be out by 2pm, for teacher's conferences for which they will be well dressed. Makes me wonder if they will catch everyone by surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. At this point,
the only way people should be caught by surprise by anything, is if they are not paying attention. I will be paying attention on Friday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. You might be right. Maybe that in part explains their joviality. ...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Fourmi_Rouge Donating Member (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
32. This is going to be a loooonngg weekend for Scootie Libber!
I know my fellow Plamologists are as eager as I am to see justice served. Hey - I remember when all sorts of posters were capping on H2Oman back in '05, because he was always optimistic even when things were moving so slowly. But here we are, at The Point of the Spear in an absolutely epic Constitutional struggle.

Those of us who followed the Plame threads all these years know there is so much more to the struggle than Scooter, prince of the Black Arts though he may be, that it staggers the imagination. This is why I am going to have a very good weekend, knowing that whatever irritation I might feel about the long deliberations, I chuckle to contemplate the weekend the defendant is going to have.

His entire world, wife, money, home, kids, friends, former and future employers, his network at risk. Everything hangs in the balance while the jury takes a long, long look at the evidence. And the longer they stay motivated to do a thorough job, the worse it is for Team Libby.

Do you think he'll sleep much? Wake up at 3:00am in a sweat? Or go to bed at 3:00am in a drunken stupor? Inquiring minds want to know! Where is good investigative journalism when we need it? Are they ALL down in the Bahamas for the festivit..oops funeral? Will our favorite corpse-chaser speculate whether or nay Anna's ugly little puppy will be interred in the tomb with her beloved?

I can imagine some juror thinking to himself right now "I cannot believe I am in a group of people about to toss a ***metaphorical*** hand-grenade ***metaphorical*** into the OVP!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. I Hope He Is Having Sleepless Nights
In my book, that would actually speak better of him. But I wonder, especially after reading how he poses for the cameras, if he isn't just an arrogant little sob who has no idea that truth may be catching up with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. It's a strange set
of circumstances. Certainly, there is no way that the smile pasted on his face is sincere. He is many things, but he is not so stupid that he does not appreciate that Mr. Fitzgerald is a serious foe. Knowing that, he knows that Mr. Fitzgerald put on a strong case. More, his defense team failed to put on the case that they had suggested in their opening statement.

Most of all, Scooter knows that he lied to the FBI investigators, and that he was stuck with that set of lies when he faced the grand jury. Scooter Libby knows that he did not tell the truth, and he knows that Patrick Fitzgerald knows he lied.

It is a lonely experience, when you are the one losing your job. We know that Libby wept at his desk on that day when he was indicted. It is a lonely road to take, being the one person being prosecuted. And it is a lonely chair to sit in, at that defense table, when some attorneys are being paid to try to save you from sure incarceration, and you know they are not able to -- because you lied.

In the fall of 2003, when he first tried to fool the FBI investigators with some weak, ill-planned lies, it may have seemed to make sense to Scooter Libby. Maybe he believed that events in Iraq would play out very differently -- for hadn't Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, and Doug Feith promised they would? But no one is invested in trying to advance that lie today.

I'm sure it would be humiliating for Scooter to say, "Oh, hey, I was lying." But he needs to. He needs to cooperate with Mr. Fitzgerald -- now -- and to explain why he lied, and what he was covering up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. I Did Not Know That, How Did I Miss It?
"Libby wept at his desk on that day when he was indicted"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
38. The dictionary scares me--please don't say they're gonna let him fly based on semantics
I do NOT have a good feeling about the jury (or most jurys for that matter). I'm afraid someone will overthink this, be intimidated (since the nature of the case involves retaliation), or hold on to some wingnutty view (we shouldn't be doing this to our leaders in a time of war).

That is, if no one in the jury has been gotten to already. Call me a pessimist, but I've been let down too many times to think they don't have something else up their sleeve for this.

It's too damned important for the admin to not try and control somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I do not
blame anyone for being suspicious of our federal court system. And I think it is important that we not trust the Bush administration, because they are lying, stealing, plundering, murdering thugs, without the slightest bit of human decency. And I do not think that we should place our trust in the congress. A few of them are honorable. But it is a very few.

Yet in this case, I am confident that Scooter Libby is going to be convicted. And Judge Walton will hand down a stiff sentence.

However, nothing shocks me with juries. And I agree 100% that this is too important for forces in the administration (especially the OVP/OSP) to not try to derail justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. what makes you so sure?
Your confidence frankly freaks me out. I think it's a BAD omen, no offense. It strikes me as overly confident and tempting Fate.

What on earth makes you so sure there'll be a conviction out of this jury?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Well, that's a
fair question. I assume that you mean me, as an individual. So I will try to give you a fair answer. To do that, I have to shift briefly from the Libby trial per say, to the less interesting topic of my beliefs.

As I have said, I'm confident that Scooter will be convicted. But juries do not shock me -- so if he is not convicted, I'm fully prepared to go forward from that point.

Earlier in this thread, a friend recalled in 2005, when others thought I was wrong to believe that the investigation was going forward, and that there would be positive results. I recall in 2005, I explained my thinking by using a quote from someone far more intelligent than I, that "everything is exactly as it should be, or it wouldn't be."

I grew up in a world very different than most people in the USA, including most DUers. I'm not saying better, or worse. Just different. And as I explained to a friend last night, while most Americans (and DUers) tend to view things in the context of the old glass that is either half-empty, or half-full ..... I was taught as a youth that the glass is actually very full .... have full of water, and half full of air, and we all require both water and air to remain alive.

Martin Luther King, Jr was correct when he said that "we must come to see that human progress never rolls in on the wheels of inevitability. It comes through the tireless efforts and persistent work of dedicated individuals ..." And, as he used to quote, "the arm of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice."

That's why I'm confident that there will be a conviction, but prepared to go forward, either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. The air half here is that Libby is already removed from office, assistant to both Shrub and Cheeney.
Were he still at work in the most powerful assistant role in recent White House history, he would be beating the drums to smite Iran. Now, he is not playing footsie with the press to be a mirror for his smoke and disintel, he's not intimidating dissidents.

He's thinking, 'What is prison really like?'.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Right.
Prison is a scarey place, even for big, strong guys who know how to fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. I agree. If they are at the dictionary stage, someone is splitting hairs.
To us this is a slam dunk. He lied. Guilty. What in hell can they be debating about? And asking to leave early for the weekend? Jeezus, you're a jury in an important case. At least put in your time like the rest of us working stiffs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbie Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
45. Hey Jurors....right here:
Edited on Thu Mar-01-07 09:48 PM by bobbiejo
LIED:

–noun 1. a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood.

2. something intended or serving to convey a false impression; imposture: His flashy car was a lie that deceived no one.

3. an inaccurate or false statement.

4. the charge or accusation of lying: He flung the lie back at his accusers.

5. –verb (used without object) 5. to speak falsely or utter untruth knowingly, as with intent to deceive.

6. to express what is false; convey a false impression.

–verb (used with object) 7. to bring about or affect by lying (often used reflexively): to lie oneself out of a difficulty; accustomed to lying his way out of difficulties.

—Idioms8. give the lie to, a. to accuse of lying; contradict.
b. to prove or imply the falsity of; belie: His poor work gives the lie to his claims of experience.

9. lie in one's throat or teeth, to lie grossly or maliciously: If she told you exactly the opposite of what she told me, she must be lying in her teeth. Also, lie through one's teeth.


Just trying to help...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC