|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
TeddyKGB (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:11 PM Original message |
Here's why I won't vote for Hillary in the primaries: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. Blah, blah, blah . . . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeddyKGB (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Thanks for a reasoned response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. You act as if the Clintons and the Bushes are equally bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeddyKGB (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. By the same token, why have another male president?(eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeddyKGB (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. That's not "the same token". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oasis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. It is as shallow to qualify a candidate by gender as it is by bloodline. "Same token". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzteris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. white male privileged capitalist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:24 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. INTERESTING point! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. I won't vote for her either in the primaries, and I won't apologize for saying so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dean Martin (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I think the Bushes and Clintons ARE equally as bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:32 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. Wow. The Bushes gave you two wars and conservative judges and you think they're the same? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. I don't happen to think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
10. Honestly, I don't see the "name" issue as important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. This may sound hopelessly idealistic, but.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
11. if she wins the nod and it comes down to her or an unnamed republic then she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:31 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. That sorta goes without saying for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. i'm leaning toward Edwards right now, something about him always makes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dembotoz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. bush light |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-25-07 09:32 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Hi dembotoz!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-24-07 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
19. I think opposing someone for family association is just as bad as supporting them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:49 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC