Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Polite Fascism Contracts the Right to Vote - Supreme Outrage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 01:24 PM
Original message
Polite Fascism Contracts the Right to Vote - Supreme Outrage

Link:http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0805/S00179.htm

ANOTHER SUPREME OUTRAGE



Justices Stevens, Kennedy, and Roberts combined with Scalia, Alito, and
Thomas to take voting rights back to1898. Image (left), Image (right)

POLITE FASCISM CONTRACTS
THE RIGHT TO VOTE


William Crawford, et al, Petitioners 07-21 v. Marion County Elections Board et al.
Indiana Democratic Party, et al., Petitioners 07-25 v. Todd Rokita, Indiana Secretary of State, et al.
U. S. ------- ( 2008 ) Opinion of STEVENS, J.

Michael Collins
”Scoop” Independent News
Washington, D.C


They wear their robes but leave the hoods off, the polite justices of the Supreme Court. They write decisions then issue them in a formal setting, behind the columns of a capitol monument, with a history that confers a dignity not deserved. The Court embodies the dilemma of our modern culture. The most awful acts are committed with bland justification by polite people who hide behind institutional trappings; for the sake of the few, at the expense of the many.


When a vital right is denied to any group or class of citizens, the people suffer a great loss. They must endure mean spirited laws put forward as rational policy then contend with the dual reality of apparently legitimate institutions conducting blatantly illegitimate attacks on the people. Brutal bigots and snarling attack dogs have been replaced with somnolent justices affirming the outrages of smiling politicians and the bureaucrats who follow their orders. The net result is the quiet evisceration of our most important rights in a manner that puts the people into a light trance of continual acceptance.

Snip

The affirmation of the Mississippi Constitution by the U.S. Supreme Court in Williams was followed by the spread of that document's deliberately conceived methods of voter suppression and voter disenfranchisement to states throughout the South and the nation. Poll taxes, literacy tests, and felon disenfranchisement had their origins in this document, one the Court affirmed. While detached from their historical origins, provisions of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890 are well placed in state constitutions across the country.

Snip

Election fraud has now been expanded in scope to include the nation's highest court, which has become the enemy of the people. Justice Stevens should read his own words from his dissent in Bush versus Gore:
"Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year's Presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation's confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law." Justice John Paul Stevens, Dissent, Bush v. Gore, Dec.12, 2000

Link:http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0805/S00179.htm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. It is getting to the point where you can either fight back
or lay down quietly for your beating...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yep, and it's Justice Stevens with the big stick this time.
Prediction: new voter ID laws everywhere possible by the 2008 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent
An R for you sir
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You've got my "R" too

What's with Justice Stevens? What a turnaround. Never would have thought...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great!
This is very important, and I thank you for posting it. We have a group of people who want to restrict who has access to the vote and, indeed, to the Constitution. In a democracy, people should be encouraged, rather than discouraged, to vote.

Nominated. This should be required reading, especially on DU. I hope that everyone who reads this nominates it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Thanks
How convenient, just in time for the Indiana primary and for the general election.

How many more laws/regulations will come forward like this before 2008 - all because the Court
gave the green light.

I hope people read the main article and get to the part about the Mississippi Constitution of 1890 or
so. That's an eye opener. That's the blue print for today - and the states don't even know it.

A Supreme Outrage!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. K & R and further enraged!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. How about that Justice Stevens?

What a turnaround, for the wrong reasons!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Beautiful! Close to the only one worthy of the robe.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Rec'd. What can we do about this? Anything at all? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Let me copy a riff of praise for those who seek the ensuring of democratic elections::
Edited on Tue May-13-08 01:47 PM by truedelphi
"In this necessary struggle, Scoop, and Michael Collins in particular, have played a major role; and here again they have produced an indispensable report, which all who still believe in our democracy must read at once, then send out far and wide."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. mother-f&$@*&!s
Edited on Tue May-13-08 01:48 PM by AtomicKitten
"Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year's Presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation's confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law."

Justice John Paul Stevens, Dissent, Bush v. Gore, Dec.12, 2000


No shit! Hello?

K&R for being the bearer of tidings pissing me off. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. I was just listening guest host Ron Reagan on air America talk about our most cherished right-VOTING
and how there is a concerted effort to limit participation of Democrats. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R

The Republicans will resort to any and all methods to try and win in November


:hi:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Our Supeme Court installed our Fascism.
We are paying heavily...

K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. "the election of nine"
and Stevens was the one to speak out, now he's gone over. I saw a comment he made on voter ID a while a go, maybe a year, and thought, he can't really believe that. But here we are. We knew it would end up that way right? Congress stopped the war after the 2006 elections and the Court bent over backwards to compensate for it's terrible mistake in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's well known that the *'s like to play a game of blackmail
and throw in an occasional suicide or twenty. If that doesn't take care of the target, they just disappear. I wonder if that's what has happened since Alito and Roberts moved into the big house. Have they corrupted the Supremes with the same MO as *? (The obvious exception is Justice Ginsberg).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. Gotta keep the bogeyman out!
Hordes of illegal immigrants, crowding the polls and commandeering our elections, right?

Of course, there is zero evidence of that having happened in even one single case, but we should go ahead and disenfranchise a bunch of people, just to be sure.

It's the new spirit of America: be afraid! Be very, very afraid!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livvy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
19. Anyone who does not see this decision as an attack on the voting...
rights of the people of this country, need to get a new sunglass prescription, buy a quality pair, or stop wearing them. It doesn't matter what color the glasses are, they are defective.

The cases of voter fraud are so negligible they should hardly warrant any concern. Who in their right mind would risk prosecution for one vote? It is bullshit. It is not a valid concern in any state.

We have that stupid law in effect in Michigan right now, however, if you don't have the ID, you just need to sign an affidavit that you are the person that is voting. Then you are allowed to vote. I went to vote in the primary, and the poll worker and I laughed, when she asked me for my ID. I said something along the lines of, "Oh, yeah, that's right, we have such a problem with fraudulent voters. In fact I think it's one of the biggest problems our nation faces right now, if you eliminate all the other problems, like fraud, the war, and the lack of transparent voting." Maybe she was just being condescending, or maybe not. It is still a bullshit, unnecessary, and intimidating tactic. I know they published the ID "law", but I'm not sure the affidavit part of it was as widely publicized. And rumors are very powerful.


Finally, a "compromise" emerged. Tilde withdrew his claim on the presidency in return for a promise by Hayes to withdraw federal authority from the South. This ended the participation of black citizens in elective politics as voters, candidates, and office holders. During Reconstruction, blacks voted in large numbers, won elective office, and served at all levels of government. This multi-cultural democracy ended just a few years after the compromise when white domination returned to the South.

Well, that worked out well. :sarcasm:

This is a really good piece, Michael. There are so many people that are aware of what is going on in our Republic, but so many more that are not. I don't know how you make more people aware of what is theirs if they want it, but is easily lost if they don't protect it. I know election reform has made progress, and it is thanks to folks like you that it has.

Kudos, my friend, and thank you.

end note...wow...did I make a lot of spelling mistakes. Spell check is our friend.
livvy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. You nailed it.
The Compromise of 1877 is one of the key turning points in our history (the other being Nathaniel Bacon's untimely death before he could get the job done).

We're alone, which we knew already. But Stevens, Mon Dieu!

This wedge issue - racism - had its origin in the FIRST American rebellion, lead by Bacon in Virginia. Blacks and whites fought together. Gov. Berkeley, displaced by the rebellion, returned, took over again and instituted lifelong slavery and other measures to divide poor whites and blacks. It's been a project of the "rulers" ever since. The should be ashamed but that's not possible, they have no shame.


Howard Zinn
http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/zinncolorline.html

Only one fear was greater than the fear of black rebellion in the new American colonies. That was the fear that discontented whites would join black slaves to overthrow the existing order. In the early years of slavery, especially, before racism as a way of thinking was firmly ingrained, while white indentured servants were often treated as badly as black slaves, there was a possibility of cooperation. As Edmund Morgan sees it:

"There are hints that the two despised group (swhite & black indentured servants) initially saw each other as sharing the same predicament. It was common, for example, for servants and slaves to run away together, steal hogs together, get drunk together. It was not uncommon for them to make love together. In Bacon's Rebellion, one of the last groups to surrender was a mixed band of eighty negroes and twenty English servants."

As Morgan says, masters, "initially at least, perceived slaves in much the same way they had always perceived servants... shiftless, irresponsible, unfaithful, ungrateful, dishonest..." And "if freemen with disappointed hopes should make common cause with slaves of desperate hope, the results might be worse than anything Bacon had done."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. keeeeeek!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. We should try and take back the court.
We gave up too much ground with Alito. Way too much.

I strongly advocate impeaching Scalia for his refusal to recuse himself in the Cheney energy task force decision.

It's simple, every American can understand it, the judge had a sleepover with the defendant while he was hearing the case.

I don't know how the Republicans would defend his behavior. I think they would have to convict him. It's too simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Almost all of them need to go. Or the next Pres can appoint five or six new Justices

That was stopped when Roosevelt tried to do it. But times are different. There's no sanctity to the 9 - it can be 99;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I want to see all of Cheney and Scalia's friends come to their rescue.
I just want to see them try and make the case that this kind of cronyism is what we all should expect from our justices.

:)

Yeah, I want to see them make that argument publicly. I really want to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. They will make the argument then the networks will fix the polls
But the public is beyond these weak magicians.

They know, we know, that it's all one big lie. The time for truth arrives on it's own schedule
and it's about that time now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. Buzz it! at BuzzFlash.Net
Edited on Tue May-13-08 08:53 PM by autorank
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. Done. And a big K & R too.
What else can I do?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #30
39. Enjly, Thanks! Share the article with a friend;) or a Rep.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
26. K&R....
"Only 38 cases of voter fraud were prosecuted from October 2002 through September 2005."

....there is no voter-fraud....only vote-counting fraud, election-fraud and the fraud committed on the American by the light-weight scum that packs our supreme court....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
28. K&R..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
29. Opportunities missed...
:kick: & R


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. TinyURL isn't a spyware site, but ...
Edited on Wed May-14-08 08:56 AM by BattyDem
spyware programs block TinyURL because people often use it to disguise links to spyware/malware sites. You can tell your spyware program to allow TinyURL, but you have to be aware that there's always a possibility it will link to a spyware site ... so you must use your own judgment on a case-by-case basis.

autorank has been a DU member for several years and I doubt that he's trying to infect us with a bad link. :-)


On edit: I clicked the links. No worries ... they're safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. WRONG!. The two links go to the Supreme Court site & the other to my site
Edited on Wed May-14-08 11:41 AM by autorank
"I thought it was phishy to run this article two weeks after the decision. I'm reporting this to the Staff." DELIBERATELY WRONG. Why are you doing this. Report away, you post was reported as well.

Look at the expanded URLs, but you did that anyway.

MissouriBlue's post is bogus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missouri Blue Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Extremely sorry, man. I retract all that.
Edited on Wed May-14-08 02:34 PM by Missouri Blue
However, I have not been able to reach the sites in question, and the Anti-Spyware says that it blocked a program from being loaded. For the record, it is a Beta. This was its first bug.

It was also very late at night and I should have gone to bed. When finally went, I did think that actually your computer might have been subverted instead, since I saw that you had posted so often.

I've followed up today with other checks about tinyurl. It's safe, and has been operating since 2002, and all of its linked sites are safe.

I apologize. It was a mistake, and an honest one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Thank you
Here are the full links. The first one is actually the same for the case citation - two headings, one case. This goes here:

Link to case citations: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-21.pdf

The 3rd link is to my web site: http://electionfraudnews.com

The specific link to my hame, Michael Collins is here: http://electionfraudnews.com/MichaelCollins.htm

I do TinyURLs because it's so much easier to format a DU post, e.g.,

"<"link:www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-21.pdf|Case cite">" versus

"<"link:tinyurl.com/3hza7p|Case cite">"

The security software is probably picking up something from the combination of "link" and ":" and "tinyurl" - who knows.

That's not to say the the Supreme Court's decision lacks a virus like quality;), just not of the computer type.

Thanks again for clearing that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
33. I was having a conversation with my mother in law... She lives in
NC... and she was expressing her desire for Obama to become the President. It surprised the heck out of me. But I think she captured the essence of the difference between Obama and Clinton/ McSame.. he makes it ok to stop hating. People are tired of looking around the corner and fearing everyone from the man with a turban sitting next to you on a plane to the next door neighbors who happen to be gay.. Its been 8 long draining years of hatred and fear.. People are just tired of it. It corrodes the soul and makes you tired. People want to be positive and they want this dark cloud called Bush and right-wing nuts to blow away.

Now, I'm not for much of his "policy", but I think he's willing to learn and modify. The one good thing about the Dem primary being extended this far out is that he has gone to the diff. states.. he has heard real people and their concerns. I'm hoping he jumps onto a much more progressive platform once he has the Dem nomination sealed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. I think the bigot faction is much reduced.
A lot of people voting for Clinton will vote for Obama. The racial smears have not yet peaked. There
is real ugly stuff out there about Obama that they'll surface but the "blowback" will be crushing.

They're trying to lop off 5% or more of the minority/poor vote with this voter ID nonsense but that
can be overwhelmed by people who don't vote coming out and voting. I expect Obama to win and then
get a lot of pressure to produce. He can't be the same old nonsense do-nothing leader we've had over
and over. 800 military installations overseas? Why? He has to do something about that. Out of Iraq
now. That's pressure. But the election piece will determine a lot of this. Obama has been screwed
by his supposed friends, e.g., Lieberman, enough to get the message. We the people are better
partners than any of "them".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
36. Sorry, Michael. Forgot to K& R before. I like the sound of the title of
NanceGregg's latest OP, so l'm off to see what she's sticking to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
40. Another bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
41. Fantastic piece of research Michael Collins....
Congratulations.

US democracy remains a disgrace as ever. The gall of this shit amazes me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
42. K&R and circulated. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
43. k
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC