Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UCS Vanguard Calls Carmakers' Bluff

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 01:19 PM
Original message
UCS Vanguard Calls Carmakers' Bluff
UCS Vanguard Calls Carmakers' Bluff

Are the automakers bluffing when they say they can't hit California's new emissions targets? If so, the Union of Concerned Scientists is calling their bluff. Yesterday the UCS unveiled a minivan design that would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by more than 40 percent while saving consumers money and keeping safety and performance intact.

Vanguard06

The UCS Vanguard — which is not a hybrid — uses off-the-shelf technologies, including the engine, transmission, and fueling systems. Besides saving the litigious manufacturers millions in R&D costs, it enables them to drop their legal challenge to California's emissions standards and get back to work making cars that people can drive without despoiling the planet. Good news for them ... right?

Assuming the automakers don't manage to derail the new standard — not necessarily a safe assumption — California will require a 34 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions for cars and light trucks within the next 10 years; for larger trucks and SUVs, the cut is 25 percent. The California standard has already been adopted by ten other states — Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington — and Arizona, Maryland, Minnesota, New Mexico, Tennessee, and Texas are on their way there.

As Spencer Quong, the senior UCS vehicles engineer and former automaker consultant who designed the Vanguard, observed: "Meeting state laws for fighting global warming should be no sweat for the automakers. They already have the solution to pollution right under the hoods of their own cars and trucks."

http://blog.wired.com/cars/2007/03/ucs_vanguard_ca.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gotta LOVE UCS!!! They make science cool!!! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yay! My state is on that list! Go Maine!
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It can't mean much if Texas is on the list
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. If it's too good to be true...
it probably isn't.

I read the specs and report from UCS, and most of the emissions reduction is from using ethanol instead of gasoline. Other than that, the whole thing is simply a tract on how to get better mileage.

A lot of the is simply tweaking, or using fairly expensive technology-- variable valve timing, tweaked transmissions, turbos, hard tires... Most of them simply get slightly better fuel mileage from the drive train. No mention of CVT transmissions, though, or final drive ratios and other stuff that can affect fuel mileage. Or how drivers can increase their mileage by driving differently and doing some simple maintenance.

All of this tweaked stuff is available and already used on many models. Some of it you can even do yourself.

Bottom line, aside from the alternative fuels thing-- buy the vehicle with the highest mileage rating and you'll get their "Vanguard."








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArmchairMeme Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yea for Massachusetts
I have already heard auto mechanics say this can be done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC