|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
sabra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-03-07 11:57 PM Original message |
Newsweek: Internal evals show the 8 dismissed U.S. attorneys had gotten mostly glowing reviews |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-04-07 12:15 AM Response to Original message |
1. The over-reaching will reach heights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-04-07 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
2. NOM! And we get to hear their testimony because they've been subpoenaed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-04-07 12:28 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Nah, they'll refuse to testify. Laws only apply to teh little people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-04-07 12:49 AM Response to Original message |
4. I Love this Scandal! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-04-07 01:07 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. They were fired; it's a major aspersion on their character and ability. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
williesgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-04-07 01:18 AM Response to Original message |
6. K&R - that fucking Gonzales should be disbarred and fired. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-04-07 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
7. Of course they did - that's exactly WHY they were fired! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-04-07 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
8. "performance-related issues" ... WHAT they were doing, not HOW POORLY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-04-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. "Excess performance-related issues." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barb162 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-04-07 01:53 AM Response to Original message |
9. this is gonna be good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC