Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Internet porn pop-ups cost this teacher her job and her freedom"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:40 AM
Original message
"Internet porn pop-ups cost this teacher her job and her freedom"
Edited on Sun Mar-04-07 01:41 AM by whereismyparty
"A teacher faces up to 40 years in jail for exposing her pupils to online pornography, amid an outcry from computer experts that she is the innocent victim of malicious software.

In a case that has become a cause célãbre in the online world, where millions of rogue websites appear unsolicited on computer screens every day, Julie Amero is gathering a network of supporters who claim that she has been wrongly convicted over an incident she says has destroyed her life.

Amero, a supply teacher in the small Connecticut town of Windham, was convicted last month for exposing her class of 12-year-olds to graphic sexual images on the classroom computer. She contends the images were inadvertently thrust onto the screen by malicious software that she was powerless to stop. “I’m scared,” said Amero, 40. “I’m just beside myself over something I didn’t do...”

http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article1464355.ece


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. this is a travesty.
If she never did anything like that before purposely, she should be exonerated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Criminally charging the teacher is incomprehensible to me
If anyone should be held culpable in a case like this, it should be the school's IT department. Even then, it shouldn't be criminal culpability -- just evaluated as 'somewhat incompetent'.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. If anybody needs to be held culpable, it's the prosecutor.
For even filing charges in this case to begin with. The exculpable evidence is there. He, and the judge refuse to see it.

They should both be fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syncronaut Seven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. IP Logs will tell.
Someone surfed a site, could have been a student.

I once had a fast food reciept save my ass. Employer tried to set me up one day before announcing significant downsizing.(~20%)

Bastard didn't want to risk paying on unemployment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. How did the fast food reciept help you? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syncronaut Seven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Someone set me up. I ate lunch at my desk but maybe a half dozen
times a year. Liked to keep up on the workload.

On one of those rare occasions I stepped away, someone surfed a porn site on my PC. Uh-huh.....

An hour back from lunch and our IT guy, personnel and the owner called me in to a conference, read termination.

Confronted, I demanded to see the IP log. IT guy smiled, I had after all, built my own office PC with scraps. No shit. Owner nearly stroked when I pulled out a Taco Bell receipt. Two minutes and nearly 4 miles apart.

I was laid off the next day with about 35 others.

Bastard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. 'Bastard' is right...
If you could entertain my personal curiosity, was this a publicly owned corporation? I believe that in most cases such Nazi management styles are typical of these organizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syncronaut Seven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 03:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Private
But there was definitely an ethics problem.

Insistence on delivering a product that functioned was probably what really got me in to trouble. To me it felt like fraud, I just didn't understand American business ethics.

You live, you learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Dang. I should save like every scrap of paper with a date on it.
It would at least be an interesting project.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I knew that was the reason "the receipt"
saved you! So you got unemployment but he wanted to FIRE YOUR ASS!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Porcupine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. What exactly do "IT logs" log?
Doesn't the server in this kind of situation record addresses only? Why would this help her? I thought the whole point of malware was that it made the infected computer access sites other than those requested by the user.

Why would this not be obvious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. IP address (and port) accessed. Time accessed. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC