Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Repuke Outrageousness: the new Orange Alert

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 04:14 PM
Original message
Repuke Outrageousness: the new Orange Alert
A couple of glorious years ago, the White House just used Orange Alerts to knock bad news out of the news. You remember, right? Something went bad for the administration, and it was Terra! Terra! Terra! Osama! Boogeyman gonna blow up your gramma's house! Terra! Orange Alert!

That shit quit working real quick, so they went to WMDs and Yellowcake. Then we found out that the Magic Mobile WMD Labs were actually made to inflate weather balloons, the only yellowcake Saddam had said Duncan Hines on the side of the box, and THAT shit quit working.

Now we're up to Republican Girls Gone Wild. Britney getting shitfaced, cutting her hair off and getting a couple of little tattoos managed to push the Walter Reed scandal out of the newspapers and the blogosphere for a Whole Week. Now the Senate is about to GO to Building 18...oh shit, Ann Coulter called John Edwards a faggot, and Barack Obama's great-great-great-great-great grandmother (dead over a hundred years!) owned Two Whole Slaves!!! Oh, the HORROR!!!!

The sickest thing is, this one's actually going to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. NO what it working is the republican media at it again
Someone said Kunich was going to introduce the Fairness Doctrine, well what happened. If he can't do that how can he do anything else. Email him folks tell him to get with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't know that it will
the veteran's scandal is hitting a lot of nerves on all sides. Too many people have a relative or neighbor who is a veteran and who depends upon VA care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You're too focused, I think
The Coulter remark stopped commentary on the Senate's upcoming tour of Walter Reed, but consider: what ELSE did it knock out of the news?

The shit is not about to HIT the fan, which would imply an easy lob of the feces into the blades, so much as it's about to be fired into it with cannons. Oh, and the "fan" it's about to be fired into has an airplane engine bolted to it.

Choose one of three possible disaster scenarios:

Scenario 1: Fearless Leader has already invaded Iran and we don't know it yet.
Problem with this scenario: DU members get most of their news from the foreign press, who isn't reporting any such invasion.
Repercussions from this scenario, as far as Bush is concerned: The military's general officer corps will use the Quickest Way Known To Get Thrown Out Of The Army: smoke a bag of weed and pee in a cup. And they'll do it in uniform, and in front of the White House. (Can you imagine the huge crowd of hippies that would form around America's highest ranking military men, all with one question on their lips: "can you pass that over, man?" if this came to fruition?)

Scenario 2: Someplace that isn't in the Middle East is about to go to hell in a handbasket.
Amplification of scenario: There are a little less than 200 countries in the world today. Very few of them are in the area spooks call MENA--Middle East and North Africa. An example that comes to mind quickly is the Korean Demilitarized Zone...North Korea is armed to the teeth with plenty of weapons that do work, has a desperate need for arable land and modern agrarian methods since DPRK agricultural techniques basically destroy a field in a couple of years, and supports a military that the Defense Intelligence Agency says can "march farther and faster on less sleep and less food than any other army in the world." South Korea's defense against this marauding horde consists of terrain--there's not a huge amount of the DMZ that's passable by military vehicles, and we mined the shit out of it decades ago--their small yet efficient army, a US Army division stationed within walking distance of the Military Demarcation line, another division in Hawaii and a third one in Washington State. Unfortunately for our friends in the Republic of Korea, the three divisions that were SUPPOSED to keep the North Korean Army in North Korea are getting blown up in the mine warfare in Iraq. Therefore, if Kim Jong Il decides he wants to reunify Korea, there's not a hell of a lot that would stop him from doing it.
Problem with this scenario: I could say "we aren't seeing any movement in the news" but surprise--North Korea isn't known as the most secretive nation on earth for nothing. Plus, all the hardware the DPRK would use to attack South Korea in the initial waves is in bunkers along the DMZ. I also considered the possibility of Bush using ICBMs to nuke Pyongyang and decided that not even Bush was that fucking crazy. North Korea is attached to South Korea, a major US trading partner; it's attached to China, a major trading partner; it's close to Japan, a major partner; and all those countries would either be destroyed or so pissed off we'd never see a nickel in foreign investment or a Kewpie doll from any of them for the rest of eternity. I think this one's pretty tight, if KJI decided he had nothing left to lose.
Repercussions from this scenario, as far as Bush is concerned: This one would be very bad for Bush's prosecution of the Iraq War, and the forthcoming Iran War. Bush HAS to defend Korea; there is no debate on this point. He can not let Korea try to stand up for itself because their whole defense program calls for ROK/US combined operations. He can't lose Korea to the South Koreans because of their status as a major trading partner. (Frank Blake, CEO of Home Depot, would personally kick Bush's ass if he handed our major supplier of appliances over to a communist who doesn't believe in foreign trade.)

On the other hand, the US Military isn't big enough to prosecute a counterrevolutionary war in Iraq while we simultaneously attempt to fight off the North Koreans' real army. Not even conscription would work to get enough army quickly enough to keep South Korea from falling...UNLESS he completely shut down the Iraq War immediately. This is, of course, what we all want...but we don't want them being pulled out of combat against revolutionaries with varying levels of training and equipment to be inserted into a war against a well-equipped professional army.

I seriously doubt that this is what they're trying to hide, though.

Scenario 3: It's Fitzmas Eve, and Bush knows it.
Amplification of scenario: We are currently awaiting the verdict in The People of the United States of America v. Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Scooter Libby's incredibly guilty. About the only way he won't be wearing prison denim for the rest of his natural life without committing suicide before his reporting date is by using some sort of technicality Fitz has worked to avoid, if he gets pardoned by Shrub quick, or if he rolls over on the administration. Whether he rolls over or not, SOMEONE higher up in the administration--Rove, Cheney or Bush, choose one or all three--is going to get caught up in this scandal, and from that relatively small scandal some serious shit will roll downhill.
Problems with this scenario: Really none. This is my vote for the most likely problem, which is why it's last.
Repercussions from this scenario, as far as Bush is concerned: Are you kidding? They don't make tin cups with presidential seals on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. No, the outragounsess is part of a continuum
and they know it works since they have been getting more and more outragous since 2000 with nobody calling them to the carpet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The public is become increasingly exasperated with all of it.
It's not that any ONE has to call them on the carpet. We all do.

I don't have cable and the only shows I miss are the Daily Show, the Colbert Report, and Olbermann. I'm sure I'd like the History Channel and maybe the Discovery Channel and some CSPAN stuff, but I get enough info online and am glad I'm not patronizing the generators of propaganda directly.

Shut the cable news off maybe. It's mostly bull. They are not doing their jobs so why continue to pay them?

Crank up the tunes and have a nice day maybe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC