|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
sansatman (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:11 PM Original message |
Impeachment won't happen because Pelosi is complicit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. yep that's why she must step down from the process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
2. If they signed off on torturing detainees, would that make them liable for war crimes? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
3. Wow, great minds and all that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
low_phreaq (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
4. I just heard that she may have threatened Conyers if he holds impeachment hearings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:33 AM Response to Reply #4 |
18. Great! Hearsay. A caller. Like that's reliable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:43 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. actually, this has been talked about all day here on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
low_phreaq (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:54 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Here is the source, I think, that was discussed on Malloy last night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-14-08 12:24 PM Response to Reply #27 |
49. thank you for the link and reference! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:35 AM Response to Reply #4 |
20. she doesn't have the power to "fire" him as chairman of the Judiciary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
6. Oh stop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. How will she ascend to the presidency while serving a sentence for war crimes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. And neither does yours. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:06 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Whoa, Nelly! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:22 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. I'm sorry, I'm having trouble finding a mention of this so-called immunity in my Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:30 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. * cricket noise * cricket noise * cricket noise * |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:43 AM Response to Reply #16 |
24. article I, section 6 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:48 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Just plain wrong. Show me one citation where that's been construed as criminal immunity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 09:27 AM Response to Reply #26 |
43. US v. Rayburn House Office Building, No 06-3105 (DC Cir. Aug 3, 2007) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 10:05 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. US v Rayburn only applies to compelled disclosure of legislative materials |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 11:47 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. it has considerable bearing on prosecution for crimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 01:25 AM Response to Reply #15 |
34. It is called legislative immunity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 08:34 AM Response to Reply #34 |
41. Like I said, find one citation that supports this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #34 |
48. Clearly then, we need an amendment to take away this immunity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:42 AM Response to Reply #14 |
22. We should impeach the president and vice president now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:34 AM Response to Reply #6 |
19. you do know Nixon wasn't convicted. no'? see, it works like this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:55 AM Response to Reply #19 |
28. Saying and doing are two different things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
7. HEy if 1000 other people want to go talk with the SPeaker, I'm game. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. The Speaker is not the only person in Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
10. I had forgotten all about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:43 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. "The thing we call our government is rotten to the core...." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:40 AM Response to Reply #10 |
21. if this is the case, then that's very good news -- Pelosi is a LIABILITY. mutiny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:46 AM Response to Reply #10 |
25. the most reasonable explanation why "Pelosi wont' impeach Bush" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-12-08 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
12. This needs to make the editorial page of every major newspaper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 08:07 AM Response to Reply #12 |
39. a cancer that must be surgically removed by us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
17. Deleted message |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:59 AM Response to Reply #17 |
30. LC, you cannot be serious here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 01:09 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. No joke. "Complicit" is a vey serious accustion give Bush crimes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 01:13 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. What word would you use for someone who has known about Bush's crimes since 2002? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 07:46 AM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Were you there for those events? You are asserting a negative. In my class = F |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 08:29 AM Response to Reply #37 |
40. This has nothing to do with negative proof. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 09:41 AM Response to Reply #40 |
44. interesting revisionist history re Jane Harman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitty Herder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 01:22 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. If the accusations were unreasoned and baseless, you might have a point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 07:51 AM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Now you are throwing out a generality without specific claim. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 12:56 AM Response to Original message |
29. Pelosi represents that part of Dems I want no part of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 02:17 AM Response to Reply #29 |
35. It is quite logical as to the reason that she was & is so adament |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 05:04 AM Response to Original message |
36. you guys are starting to sound like the hillaryis44 people..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
42. There is no other reason that makes sense: she's protecting her own interests, 'cause she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-13-08 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
46. Highly recommended & I couldn't agree more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC