Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who should take over Meet The Press?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:07 PM
Original message
Poll question: Who should take over Meet The Press?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Too soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tacky.
His body isn't even cold yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Although it's in bad taste to speculate on such things before the body is even cold
I would really love to see Keith or Rachel get the gig. But my cynical side says Tweety or David Gregory is going to get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. I voted Rachel Maddow, Dan Rather or Thom Hartmann...
... would be other choices for me. Frankly it really is WAY to soon to be thinking of this. RIP :patriot:Tim Russert :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. How about returning the show to its original format?
with a panel of questioners as opposed to a single presstitute with a direct fax line to the RNC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammythecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Not a bad idea.
There's some safety in numbers.

I used to like Russert. Until the late 90's when he became a tool, and later a cheerleading enabler of a criminal war.

I've been saying all along that it might take a generation till we get a press with integrity again. We'd have to wait for the current group of self-serving cowards to leave and, hopefully, be replaced with others that weren't complicit in the crimes of this administration. I never expected, or wanted, the change to come about in this fashion, but maybe this program can become watchable again. I had lost ALL trust in Tim Russert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Seems logical to me
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 03:31 PM by depakid
After all, the show is titled "Meet the Press," not meet the corporate/for right lackey.

The same logic would apply if a a left wing hack took over the show.

A rotating panel of real journalists, sampled each from the press corps around the nation (and not just from the usual and mendacious) puditocracy) would go a long way toward reviving a show that at least in my Aussie influenced mind became an unwatchable propaganda hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dan Rather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. YES! Dan "Frikkin" Rather................
OMG, you are a GENIUS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. A little bit of trivia about MTP...
"Meet the Press made its television debut on November 6, 1947 and is still on the air as of 2008. It is now the longest-running television show in worldwide broadcasting history..."

--http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meet_The_Press">Wikip*dia

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. But it is not anything like the news program it was
The name "Meet the Press" applies to another program ... so to call it the longest running show is a bit of a stretch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. It's an institution, nevertheless. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I think NBC really stretches the point for marketing value
It sounds really important to say "The longest running....etc." In reality, it is the "Oldest continuously used name..."
The shows format has completely changed ... anyway, that's my .02. Doesn't take away from the value of the show or the impact that Russert had.

I had some problems with some of his questioning, but all in all he was a good interviewer/newsperson. I'll miss him.

So sad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. It is very shocking, he was only 58.
And apparently there was no indication he had heart problems.

The show will go on, and I don't think he would be offended by that.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. David Gregory
Would be my choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
31. I'd put money on it.
It'll be him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keep_it_real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. How about KO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Dan Rather
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Dan Rather....
Unleash him with a vengeance.

Oh sorry! I forgot that the Military Industrial Complex wouldn't want to lose their ASSets in the government and risk the truth seeing the light of day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brucefan Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. Keith. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. I've wanted Russert off MTP since 2000. So I've had awhile to
think about it. Rachel Maddow would be my first choice but she's to left wing for TPTB. That said, David Gregory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. Donohue
hands down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mulsh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. JON STEWART -
oh, guess the host has to work for NBC. naw fuck it. Jon Stewart is the best person doing interviews in any media. I think they should just cancel the show and show a block of national and regional political commercials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I don't know...
...wasn't MTP the kind of show he makes fun of?

Why would he want to host a show like that!?

Unless you're joke of course...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. Other. What a ridiculous set of choices. NONE of those will get it.
They're not even on the LONG list. Nada.

Brian Williams is the likely choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Nope, the net anchor isn't getting it. David Gregory has a shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. like you know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I have a pretty good chance of being right.
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 05:03 PM by greyghost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. The choices I guessed at based on...
...who was working on NBC's newsmagazine show, Dateline NBC (Curry and Phillips), whichever cable personality was popular, but didn't have their own show (Maddow) and whoever wasn't the network anchor.

I also considered adding Viera from The Today Show and maybe Jane Pauley, but decided to keep the list short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
26. Other: Rachel Ray. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
30. Bring Meet The Press back to what it originally was: meeting the press!
Larry Spivack, who started the program, had three journalists, different
ones every time, form a panel who asked questions of the guest in rotation.
It was almost like a mini-press conference without the chaotic shouting to
be heard. Spivack got to ask questions whenever he wanted, but hey, it was
his show. None of the invited journalists got shut out. My father was one of
them on a regular basis. He was on once every two years or so.

Instead of making the moderator the star, they should make MTP what it used to
be, and make the name of the show mean something again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
32. I voted other...Chuck Todd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
33. Revolving Panel Of Journalists
This was the show's original format...get four reporters...different ones every week...and this should include some of the better-known bloggers...to interview a newsmaker. The new "moderator" should do just that...what Lawrence Spivak did with the show for nearly 35 years. It's not as "sexy" and into the cult of personality of the beltway...yeah, maybe too much to ask for the corporate media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
34. Other: Amy Goodman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
35. This is a push poll. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC