EXCLUSIVE: Clint Curtis Documents More Votes Than Reported, Evidence of Wide-Spread FL 2006 Fraud...

[BradBlog]

"We have now found absolutely…more votes for Democrats than the official results show. Absolutely more votes. No trends, no guesses. More votes. That should never happen." -- Clint Curtis in new interview.

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Clint Curtis Documents Evidence of Widespread 2006 Florida Election Fraud
The Whistleblower Turned U.S. House Candidate Continues His for Fight for Election Integrity and His Federal Challenge to his 2006 Race with the Corrupt Tom Feeney

OTHER NOTABLE QUOTES FROM CURTIS IN THE INTERVIEW:

"The fact that we were robbed in the way we were is actually a blessing. It gives us a chance to prove it once and for all."

"If had stuck with the 50-state strategy, I think they would have had better numbers than they had, but then again, if your machines aren’t counting, it doesn’t matter how much money you spend."

FULL INTERVIEW:
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4220

[malaise]

1. K&R for more truth n/t

[Botany]

2. Nothing to see here move on nothing to see here

So the "recorded votes" in some strong dem areas had him @ 55%
but when he canvassed the areas he found out he got 80%?

We won big last fall but with a clean count how big would have it been?

[Tuesday_Morning]

3. Really interesting interview

k & r!

[porphyrian]

4. I'll kick that hard. - n/t

[Senator]

5. Note The Audit Process Here Folks -- A REAL "Inventory" (repost from ER thread)

What Curtis is doing, in effect, is to audit the signature books themselves. Yes, an arduous process, but the only thing that circumvents any and all types of election theft techniques.

He's doing a survey of the electorate. Which is what an election really is -- not a contest or competition -- rather, a mechanism to ascertain an objective reality, the current will of the people.

This "literal audit" is what none of the "improved" election proposals currently offer. Any auditor/accountant in the business world will tell you that something on a piece of paper, even an "audit trail," is just that. To audit a business you must go to the shelves (or docks, or warehouses) and inspect/count the actual products in person.

In an election that means a live human being -- being asked if they did in fact vote and for whom. (No, "privacy" would not be a problem.) Even a small random sampling audit, using this (real) process, would be a stone deterrent to election thieves.

There's no way to game it. No "ghost" voters. No pumped-up registration rolls. No stuffed ballot boxes or memory cards.

Coupled with severe punishment (life in prison?, OK 20 years) for attempts to "unlawfully effect" an election result by say, more than 5 votes, and we'd have the confidence we deserve in our elections.

It's not rocket science. Just a brute force solution that overcomes any techno-politico manipulation.

--

[glitch]

6. K & R nt

[HCE SuiGeneris]

9. And the SCOTUS gives our votes away and installs a despot.

Gee, thanks y'all. :argh:

Thanks for the report BB.

[Wilms]

7. :) n/t

[Kurovski]

8. kick(nt)

[Richard Steele]

10. K&R

[BradBlog]

11. K&R