Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Wilson Says She Contacted Prosecutor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 09:50 PM
Original message
Rep. Wilson Says She Contacted Prosecutor
Rep. Heather Wilson (R-N.M.) acknowledged today that she contacted a federal prosecutor to complain about the pace of his public corruption investigations, as the Senate Ethics Committee signaled that it had opened a preliminary inquiry into a similar communication by the state's senior senator, Pete V. Domenici (R).

Wilson denied allegations from former New Mexico U.S. attorney David C. Iglesias that she was pressuring him to speed up the pace of a public corruption investigation involving Democrats in the waning days of a tight election campaign.

"I did not ask about the timing of any indictments and I did not tell Mr. Iglesias what course of action I thought he should take or pressure him in any way," Wilson said in a statement to the Washington Post. "The conversation was brief and professional."

Iglesias, one of seven U.S. attorneys fired by the Justice Department on Dec. 7, is expected to testify to Congress tomorrow that Wilson and Domenici were indeed trying to sway the course of his investigation. Domenici acknowledged Sunday that he called Iglesias about the corruption case, but said he did not pressure him.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/05/AR2007030501241.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. How we long for thee Patricia Madrid n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. complaining about the pace of a suit ISN'T pressuring?
How much koolaid did this woman drink on a daily basis?

Brief and professional in a pig's ass! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. And if you believe this one, she also has a bridge
to sell you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. They didn't tell them what to do. They just asked questions
like, "What the fuck are you doing?" or "Do you love your children?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. This SCREAMS talking point memo!
From what Domenici said -
"However, at no time in that conversation or any other conversation with Mr. Iglesias did I ever tell him what course of action I thought he should take on any legal matter. I have never pressured him nor threatened him in any way."

From what Wilson said -
"I did not ask about the timing of any indictments and I did not tell Mr. Iglesias what course of action I thought he should take or pressure him in any way," Wilson said in a statement to the Washington Post. "The conversation was brief and professional"

Sound damn similar to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Set's see, now--
This woman insisted, republican style, that she did not call and now, seeing that the hammer is about to descend on her mentor, knowing that a suitable penalty in congress-a democratic congress-can range from a no harm, no foul, to expulsion, decides to come clean.

Again, typically republican, she thinks that telling a half truth will expunge a previous lie. And with other republicans, of course it would.
Truth means nothing to them except when it will get themselves out of a scrape. The truth is a fluid thing, a strong spice, to be used only in tiny, careful measure.

What about the interference in the prosecution of whatever case the guy was hunting for?

So now we are expected believe her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Tick... tick... tick... tick...
The fuse is lit. This might very well blow up.

I love the smell of obstruction of justice indictments in the morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC