Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Levin Rejects Bush Administration's Proposal on Labor and Trade

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 08:24 AM
Original message
Levin Rejects Bush Administration's Proposal on Labor and Trade
The top U.S. Democratic lawmaker for trade rejected a Bush administration proposal on how to treat labor standards in free-trade agreements with countries such as Peru and Colombia.

A plan by the U.S. Trade Representative's office to allow trade partners to adhere to either international labor standards or U.S. labor law ``misses the point'' of Democrats' long- standing demands, said Representative Sander Levin, chairman of the House trade subcommittee.

If the administration holds to this plan, pending free- trade agreements with Peru, Colombia and Panama won't pass Congress, Levin said. He spoke today at the Center for American Progress, a Washington research group that supports Democratic policies.

Agreement on labor standards between Congress and the administration is crucial to the fate of these agreements as well as any hope of renewing President George W. Bush's ``fast- track'' trade negotiating authority, which expires at the end of June. That authority smoothes the negotiating process by allowing the administration to work out trade agreements that Congress must accept or reject without amendment.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=a3gccvd3zM1Y&refer=latin_america
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. With the Democrats in control of the Senate and House
Edited on Tue Mar-06-07 09:09 AM by karynnj
Bush's standards are very likely dead. Even in the heavilly Republican Congress of last year, the Democrats were almost able to add better standards to CAFTA. It may be that Republicans are more willing to insist on standards overseas, but the charge to not require these standards came from the same corporate interests that fight them domesticly. This may be an area where the change of power has real advantages.

When CAFTA was passed, the Finance committee defeated 10 to 10 an AFL/CIO supported John Kerry amendment that would have insisted on labor standards - with the current Congress this would easily have passed out of the committee. (To get 10/10, Kerry had some Republican support.)

Here's a quote from Sweeney's AFL/CIO press statement:
"Senator Kerry (D-Mass.) will introduce an important amendment to the administration’s draft implementing legislation that would address a key failing of agreement by giving workers’ rights the same priority as corporate rights. His amendment would go a long way toward fixing the inadequate workers’ rights provisions in this lopsided trade deal by making protections for core labor standards fully enforceable.

The Kerry amendment would ensure that all the CAFTA countries meet international core workers’ rights standards, a change to the agreement that has been a key demand of workers in both the U.S. and Central America."

Here is a link to that and to other information on the amendment.
http://kerry.senate.gov/v3/cfm/record.cfm?id=238846

The Finance and commerce committees are where many of these issues are dealt with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC