http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272611947.shtmlDefending Ann CoulterBy Cliff Kincaid
Mar 6, 2007
The Fox News Channel did a segment on Monday asking why Ann Coulter’s comments about John Edwards being a faggot have gotten more media attention than Bill Maher’s remark that more people would be alive if Vice President Cheney were dead. The answer is that Coulter made her comments at a national conference of conservatives, which included Cheney, former Ambassador John Bolton, several Senators, several presidential candidates, and was sponsored by most major conservative groups. By contrast, Maher made his remarks on a little-watched cable show. Plus, Coulter’s remarks were aired on C-SPAN.
There’s another difference: Maher has never had any credibility. Coulter, on the other hand, did have some. Back in 2003 I wrote a very sympathetic column about Coulter, noting how she demolished Bill O’Reilly during a discussion of alleged McCarthyism in Hollywood. Her book, Treason, was an excellent treatment of this controversy. She is a lawyer by training and once worked at a conservative legal group. She came out of the National Journalism Center in 1985, eight years after I went through the program.
But somehow, somewhere, something went wrong. Coulter decided that she had to stop being a serious analyst and commentator.
...
On the other hand, I have received some interesting emails from Coulter defenders. One was upset that John Edwards is exploiting Coulter’s attack to raise money for his presidential campaign. Edwards “is trying to raise $100,000 from other faggots for his faggot campaign,” he said. Another said, “It’s time we started upping the rhetoric against this (liberal) lobby.” Still another said: “The only thing giving conservatism a bad name is cowards afraid to use terms like ‘faggot.’” Finally, there was this one: “Ann shows more testosterone than you.”
I pray that these comments do not reflect the future of the conservative movement. Otherwise, there won’t be much of a conservative movement, at least in the sense that I understand the term.