Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

“The only thing giving conservatism a bad name is cowards afraid to use terms like ‘faggot.’”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:18 AM
Original message
“The only thing giving conservatism a bad name is cowards afraid to use terms like ‘faggot.’”

http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272611947.shtml

Defending Ann Coulter
By Cliff Kincaid
Mar 6, 2007

The Fox News Channel did a segment on Monday asking why Ann Coulter’s comments about John Edwards being a faggot have gotten more media attention than Bill Maher’s remark that more people would be alive if Vice President Cheney were dead. The answer is that Coulter made her comments at a national conference of conservatives, which included Cheney, former Ambassador John Bolton, several Senators, several presidential candidates, and was sponsored by most major conservative groups. By contrast, Maher made his remarks on a little-watched cable show. Plus, Coulter’s remarks were aired on C-SPAN.

There’s another difference: Maher has never had any credibility. Coulter, on the other hand, did have some. Back in 2003 I wrote a very sympathetic column about Coulter, noting how she demolished Bill O’Reilly during a discussion of alleged McCarthyism in Hollywood. Her book, Treason, was an excellent treatment of this controversy. She is a lawyer by training and once worked at a conservative legal group. She came out of the National Journalism Center in 1985, eight years after I went through the program.

But somehow, somewhere, something went wrong. Coulter decided that she had to stop being a serious analyst and commentator.

...

On the other hand, I have received some interesting emails from Coulter defenders. One was upset that John Edwards is exploiting Coulter’s attack to raise money for his presidential campaign. Edwards “is trying to raise $100,000 from other faggots for his faggot campaign,” he said. Another said, “It’s time we started upping the rhetoric against this (liberal) lobby.” Still another said: “The only thing giving conservatism a bad name is cowards afraid to use terms like ‘faggot.’” Finally, there was this one: “Ann shows more testosterone than you.”

I pray that these comments do not reflect the future of the conservative movement. Otherwise, there won’t be much of a conservative movement, at least in the sense that I understand the term.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. The actual conservative movement
died a protracted death long ago, probably with the last of the isolationists in the 20's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here's the good news, Cliff. That is not the future of the conservative movement.
Edited on Tue Mar-06-07 11:22 AM by tanyev
Bad news: It is the present. This is what it took to (almost) open your eyes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Conservative "movement" is the correct term...like a stinky tapered turd
No matter how you pinch it, it's still a stinky turd.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. You couldn't get Goldwater to stop calling people Faggots
Faggot this. Faggot that. Yep. That's what conservatism was all about back in the good old days. What is this world coming to? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. Coulter decided that she had to stop being a serious analyst and commentator.
WTF has he been snorting?

AC NEVER was "a serious analyst and commentator"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Perhaps he remembers a time when she was only slightly batshit crazy,
as opposed to the past 8+ years when she's been totally batshit crazy and seems to be getting worse? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. That must be it
lolol

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. idiots think other idiots are geniuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Here's something that I don't "get". Maybe someone can help me out.
Coulter isn't actually saying that Edwards is a homosexual, right? She is saying, what? That he is "acting" like a homosexual? I don't get it. If she is saying that Edwards is gay - so what? That is no insult. The problem is that Coulter is using hate speech. Somehow, she and her ilk feel it is fine to use such ugly, unacceptable language in a public, recorded, setting. This is troubling. It reminds one of how the Nazis used hate speech with impunity and how the old KKK did so often in the past.
But there seems to be some sort of concern that she insulted Edwards, when, to my mind, she simply outed herself as to what she really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Ected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I Think Everyone Misunderstands Coulter's Use of the Word "Faggot"
She didn't intend any homosexual connotations.

She simply was using the word like you would use "motherf*cker" or "assw*pe". She meant it to be hateful, derogatory...but not literal.

As progressives, we immediately read into it what we will. But I don't think AC was paying any attention to detail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. uh huh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. Go Ann, Go!
I wish the wingnuts would truly unleash the Coulterthing. Let it spew more and more of its virulent, out-of-control sludge. Louder! More! Show conservatism for what it really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC