|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:44 PM Original message |
Fitz states investigation is officially over--(inactive) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsmesgd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. If Libby should flip and come out with some info, he'll start back up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:45 PM Original message |
You know he opens the door for that possibility... eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. "If Libby and his lawyers want to pursue any other options they can contact us." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
2. Insanity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dubyaD40web (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. Damn! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zanne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. So the Plame leak will never be investigated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Genealogist (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:59 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. Plame leak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 01:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
35. The Plame Leak should be investigated by Congress. So to say it 'will never be' is premature |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
5. The Democrats in Congress needs to go after Cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Yeah right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chelsea0011 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
6. Unlike Ken Starr, he won't be running up a bill unless something else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. I think the evidence from this trial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:58 PM Response to Reply #6 |
24. Fitz isn't an Independent Counsel so I don't think he has that option anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. He's satisfied with one scape goat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cerridwen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
9. Inactive - not over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:48 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. True he did say inactive, and he left the door open |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crabby Appleton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. and that they're all going back to their day jobs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
12. he also said if the defense lawyers have a proposal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
global1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
14. Fitz Really Didn't Say Officially Over - He Said 'Inactive'....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. He also stated that he would cooperate with Congress if there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. It's a regular grand jury, not a special grand jury, it serves until its term is up. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Thanks. I was mistaken. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
15. The Wilsons civil case is ready to blow, don't forget that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
16. He's putting up a smoke screen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
17. Just said Plame's relationship with CIA was classified |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
18. What's the point of announcing that the investigation is "inactive"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
19. Really cause I can come up with a bunch of other cases! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:55 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. He left the door open for any evidence that might |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 01:04 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. And what are the odds that an "inactive" investigation brings new evidence to light? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 01:11 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. depends if Scooter (or anybody else) brings in new information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 01:32 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. This was all just another show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. IMHO at lot depends on Mrs. Libby -- I get the feeling she is pretty upset |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 01:35 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. It is the Assistant to the VP of the US breaking the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
22. the repuke plan worked again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
29. He qualified the statement -- no new charges unless they receive new information EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 01:15 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Does he know something we don't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Emit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
33. Key words -- if Congress requests an investigation... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ncrainbowgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-06-07 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
34. Actually- it said that that THIS investigation is over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 13th 2025, 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC