Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

See What Can Happen When You Can't Be Bothered Getting A Recount Right?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:25 AM
Original message
See What Can Happen When You Can't Be Bothered Getting A Recount Right?
especially when you knew the majority of the people in this country (and people all around the globe) were depending on you to DO THE RIGHT AND HONEST THING

this is my special message to:
"Jacqueline Maiden, elections coordinator of the Cuyahoga County Elections Board, and ballot manager Kathleen Dreamer" who "were convicted of a felony count of negligent misconduct of an elections employee. Prosecutors accused Maiden and Dreamer of secretly reviewing preselected ballots before a public recount on Dec. 16, 2004. They worked behind closed doors for three days to pick ballots they knew would not cause discrepancies when checked by hand, prosecutors said."
http://www.sptimes.com/2007/01/25/Worldandnation/Former_deputy_charged.shtml

Jacqueline & Kathleen and everyone else who assisted in the theft of american's votes in the 2004 elections--take a look!
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2005/feb/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2005/mar/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2005/apr/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2005/may/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2005/jun/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2005/jul/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2005/aug/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2005/sep/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2005/oct/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2005/nov/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2005/dec/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2006/jan/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2006/feb/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2006/mar/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2006/apr/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2006/may/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2006/jun/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2006/jul/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2006/aug/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2006/sep/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2006/oct/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2006/nov/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2006/dec/
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/dates/2007/jan/

not to mention
http://www.iraqbodycount.net/
http://www.antiwar.com/casualties/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Contrite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. OMG. This should be major banner headlines everywhere.
PROOF that the elections are rigged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. More here
Edited on Thu Jan-25-07 03:37 AM by Contrite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kicked and Recommended!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Did they not do a recount?
I thought they selected a particular group of ballots and counted it ahead so they knew it would match. If it matched, then there's no vote discrepancy that can be proven, isn't that right??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. ok....that's one way to look at it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm asking a question
Did they find any discrepancies in what they were supposed to recount? Was that even part of the court case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. This isn't totally clear, but it looks like yes
http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjournal/news/state/16536269.htm

Special prosecutor Kevin Baxter, who was brought in from Erie County to handle the case, did not claim the workers' actions affected the outcome of the election - Kerry gained 17 votes and Bush lost six in the county's recount.

But Baxter insisted the employees broke the law when they worked behind closed doors three days before the public Dec. 16, 2004, recount to pick ballots they knew would not cause discrepancies when checked by hand so they could avoid a lengthier, more expensive hand recount of all votes.


It's not clear to me whether the votes involved in "Kerry gained 17 votes and Bush lost six in the county's recount" came from the batch of votes that are being complained about in this lawsuit.

However, it really isn't the point, nor is the low ("only 17 + 6") number of votes affected relevant. The issue is that they took actions which could be construed as tampering with the integrity of the recount.

The republican strategy of election fraud is "death by a thousand small cuts." A few votes per precinct can make the difference in a close election. If recounts are tampered with to avoid a full recount, then there can be no election integrity at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. It's also to raise doubt about the voting process per se, so that having a judge
Edited on Thu Jan-25-07 08:50 AM by WinkyDink
or Supreme Court decide seems the "fair" way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. You know if I was convicted for a crime - I'd probably want to spill my guts out...
if there was a certain Secretary of State that told us not to bother much with the recount. The real crime was committed by Kenneth Blackwell - he was the 'kingpin' where these people were nothing more than the pawns playing his game
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. too bad they don't "spill it" for the sake of democracy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. It's important to prosecute the pawns
too, but you're right, the big fish always get off it seems.

The "pawns" little felonies DO add up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC