Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We Can Only Hope That This Freeper Is Correct !!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:40 PM
Original message
We Can Only Hope That This Freeper Is Correct !!!
***********************************************************************************************
To: PSYCHO-FREEP

here come the impeachments....

200 posted on 03/06/2007 9:11:08 AM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
**********************************************************************************************

Link: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1796101/posts?q=1&&page=151

OK Congress, even the FreepLoops are waiting for it.

The time is ripe.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deepthought42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Millions of impeachments... impeachments for Bush...
Edited on Tue Mar-06-07 02:42 PM by deepthought42
Hey, I won't argue with them. Except...do they realize we don't wear burqas? Um...no, I suppose that's asking too much...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. They think we're weak on terra, therefore...
Edited on Tue Mar-06-07 02:49 PM by TWriterD
the "Moslems" will take over the Homeland, and all of of our women will be wearing burquas some day. At least that's what a friend's wingnut neighbor tells me - with a straight face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deepthought42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. With a straight face you say? Amazing.
Well I suppose if we liked the idea of wearing burqas so much, we'd start wearing them, but then you know, that's just me... :eyes: I'll never understand stupid people...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Based on the over-the-top burqa comment...
my guess is that "tcrlaf" with 200 posts may be a DUer just phuckin' with them, and they haven't caught on yet. Dumbasses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insane_cratic_gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just reading their dribble on Fitz
Edited on Tue Mar-06-07 02:59 PM by insane_cratic_gal
I guess they have no clue that this man before being appointed to Plamegate .. was prosecuting terrorists!

And yet because he's serving the law of the land by prosecuting Libby he's some how a traitor?

The immensity of hate and the willingness to stay ignorant of the facts, even now, surprises me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "Willingness to stay ignorant of the facts."
A wonderful description of this group of people. There are a few bushbots in my office - I love to remind them they are too smart to continue to believe in bush. This line will be another good jab at them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Oh, we have that problem, too, just not in the same league
They have, collectively, massive quantities of "willingness to stay ignorant of the facts."

We just have it a little bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. As liberals we should be able to look at both sides and decide for
ourselves which is right or wrong or even see there are shades of gray in there.

If we can't do that, we are pretty much the same as the repubs we deride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I know, and we usually do.
But there are issues (well, at least one issue) where a significant portion of Democrats put on the blinders and will not let facts intrude. But don't worry. I'm on it.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I assume the issue you are talking about eating babies.
Because no matter how wrong I hear it is - they are just so delicious.

That's the issue you are talking about right? Or impeachment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. lol
No, although I'm sure the freepers think that that is what we do after a vigorous bout of ritualized group abortion! :rofl:

And impeachement is a matter of opinion.

No, I'm talking about the Gungeon. A lot of it is opinion about what and where, but some people just don't (or won't) get basic facts.

But boy oh boy it makes for some fun discussions! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Gungeon - I thought it was something important.
You can have all the gun control you want - as along as I have my .50 cal sniper rifle and bunker full of armor piercing bullets.

Have you ever wondered why the NRA, who thinks any control of weapons (like my sniper rifle) leads to a total ban on all gun ownership, doesn't stand up to infringements on other civil liberties. For instance, isn't a Free Spech Zone an infringement on the First Amendment? Under their logic, if this happens, won't we be rounded up for speaking our minds?

If you've talked with a nutter about this, I'd love to hear their thoughts.

BTW, I've got a .30-06 at home (and use itrepsonsibly for hunting) and don't see any problems with requiring registration on any firearms.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Oh, it is important
Please note that while the 1993 Assault Weapons Ban was in effect, Democrats held neither house of Congress, and a minority of governorships and state legislatures.

So, yeah, it's important. And I'm particularly concerned that already, very quietly, Democrats are intruducing permenant and even more restrictive bans against 'assault weapons. I mean, how many times do you have to piss on the electric fence before you say "Gee, maybe I shouldn't do that anymore?"

Nobody is talking about it. It is the elephant in the room.

The NRA's political focus is on the 2nd Amendment, that is why they don't really get involved in the other aspects of the Constitution. And that's okay, we all have our specialties. NOW and the NAACP comes to mind as being focused on other aspects of the Constitution.

Frankly, watching that NRA VP (LaPierre, I think his name is) at the conservative conference over the weekend (same as Coulter) went off on the fictional 'liberal media', which I think is wrong and short-sighted. I'm thinking about writing his a letter. For what it's worth, I'm not nor have I ever been an NRA member.

I'm also a little peeved at the ACLU because they wuss out on this issue as well. So if I want somebody lobbying for ALL of my Constitutional rights, I have to join at least two lobbying groups?

As to the gun-registration issue, my concern about that is really with the fact that it is just one more list the government has on you. And when that information is collected and stored and available, it will be used. Considering the proto-fascist state of our current federal government, I'm not really enthused about the idea, especially since our police forces are chronically overworked and understaffed.

I don't think it really works, ultimately. I think it is a stepping-stone to other things. The people who advocate stringent gun control make a very big deal out of public safety, and seem to often times be fairly shrill on the subject. And nothing seems to be enough to satisfy their attitude.

In the UK they have mandatory gun registration, have completely outlawed all handguns of all types, and banned all self-loading rifles and shotguns. And also to combat crime, they put up 4.2 million public-area surveillience camera, monitored and recorded by the police. And now those same people don't want the police to carry guns, either, because they don't want to encourage an armes race between criminals and the cops. This as the crime rate and homicide rates soar.

I think if we put the effort and money into reducing poverty, or legalized recreational drugs to various extents, would do far more to reduce violent and non-violent crime and homicides than making you register your deer rifle.

By the way, if you really think registering your rifle will help stop crime, I'm sure that your local police will take down the make, model, caliber, and serial number of your gun if you are insistant enough about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Me Too...
It's either a sign of wanton immaturity (my team is better than your team, and can do no wrong), or gross negligence of their duties as citizens of this country.

The only thing worse would be if they are actual traitors, but I think most are too stupid for that.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC