Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

dammit, Randi just had a good point re Fitz and Cheney

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:27 PM
Original message
dammit, Randi just had a good point re Fitz and Cheney
Because Cheney is VP, he has the power to declassify information such as Plames CIA status. So therefore Congress would have to start a new investigation regarding Cheney.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't there a formal process to do that?
and, I believe prior to Team Bush assuming power, the VP did not have that power...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. If I remember correctly (not a Libby joke) W signed an exec. order giving Dick this power
or more like Dick told W to sign it and then he gave him back his bubblewrap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. No. That Order only allowed Cheney to classify docs in his own office
The VP does not now, and never has had, the power to declassify CIA documents. He certainly can't reveal the identity of covert CIA officers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. exactly. And even if he did, theres' a protocol where you tell people
who are involved that you are about to de-classify, and some other paperwork--so a CIA agent doesn't get caught out without knowing his work is declassified. Cheney did none of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
34. Since dicky scumbag claims he doesn't fall under the Executive branch
of the government he doesn't have the right to declassify classified material.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kikosexy2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. I say...
go for it..before Ol' Dicky gets a heart blood-clot and he's kapput! Cialis, Levitra nor Viagra can't bring this limp Dick back to life..har, har..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kikosexy2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. I say...
go for it..before Ol' Dicky gets a heart blood-clot and he's kapput! Cialis, Levitra nor Viagra can't bring this limp Dick back to life..har, har..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lena inRI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fitz is smarter than Randi, sorry. . .
and he's waaaay smarter than Bushco. . .including Darth Cheney.

:smoke: :smoke: :smoke: :smoke: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. meaning what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ObaMania Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
33. Meaning she's just trying to fill dead air time.
I take practically all of Randi's rants/points with a grain of salt. She tends to ramble on with self servitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. BUT...
there is protocol required to make sure parties involved are aware of the de-classification-which was NOT done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. details are what signing statements are for
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. This has been Cheney's strategy on damage control dating way back
Edited on Tue Mar-06-07 03:43 PM by Emit
to that interview he did with Brit Hume about shooting what'shisname in the face -- toward the end of that. John Dean had some words to say about it at that time.

Edited to add link: http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20060407.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. declassify
Declassify and disseminating are 2 different things!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not true.
That is simply not true. It has been debunked numerous times on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Kicking your comment to OP -- Cheney cannot declassify CIA agents eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. so Cheneys defense would be ignorance of proper procedures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. No.
They never made that claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Yet
Edited on Tue Mar-06-07 03:54 PM by LSK
Or am I missing something where

1. They did not need this defense ?

2. This defense is impossible ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. The idea that
Cheney could declassify Plame's identity is nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. They did not follow the correct process
Even with the E.O. giving Cheney the ability to de-classify (which oddly happened right around the time they started to investigate the Wilsons) there still is a process of declassification that they did not follow.

It's not like Dick Cheney or * can wiggle their nose like Bewitched or nod the head like Jeannie and then something is declassified.

The details escape me at the moment, I'm not an expert just a Plame thread junkie. I recall it requiring paperwork and processing it with the CIA or the NSA, the orginal agency that classified it. You have to detail what exactly is de-classified. Scooter showed the NIE to Judy Miller. If that was still classified (regardless of what was in Cheney's head) then it would be espionage which is easier to prove than the releasing of the covert agent's name. FItz even mentioned that it was provable and a more relevant statute to this case when he had his press conference in Oct. 2005.

Consulted google for better reference than my limited memory:

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20060407.html

John Dean-

At a minimum, the filing indicates that the President and Vice President departed radically, and disturbingly, from long-set procedures with respect to classified documents - and that the Vice President, in particular, exceeded his declassification authority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Thanks for posting this....remembered reading it way back and
also some posts by H20man following up on what John Dean said about what Bush and Cheney were doing not being the proper protocol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. I can see Cheneys defense going something like this
"Well I told them to put the paperwork forward. I assumed it was done."

Something along those lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. well if he's telling that to a jury
We've already won. In my heart I just can't believe this is the end. It's only a beginning with a Dem Congress and Fitz saying the investigation is "Inactive." Tip of the iceberg and I want to see the whole damn iceberg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. He has that power according to HIM. . I, for one,
don't believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. I thought that the only thing they claimed they declassified was
certain parts of the NIA document related to the Niger sale to Hussein or something closely related. What they did was present it in such a way as to make it look like Plame was declassified. ?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
22. Your post does not correctly state what Randi was saying.
She did not claim that Cheney has the power to declassify. She was indicating that Cheney "says" he has the right to declassify.

Randi was skeptical regarding the executive order. She was poking fun at Cheney's claim and Randi wants further examination and clarification on the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I got the impression that she was saying that
Because Cheney's power to declassify, then Fitz was not going to pursue Cheney and it was then up to Congress to address this aspect of the case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. No.
I am not sure if it is your intent but you seem to keep saying that Cheney's claim of ability to de-classify is a given. A given accepted by Randi and by Fitz. The issue of such an ability is still open. However, I assume the determination of such an ability by e.o. for the v.p. needs to be reviewed by the Justice department - but as Randi indicated they (Alberto) won't pursue the problem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. well if she has not accepted it as given, then why did she bring it up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. You seem to have an agenda.
What is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. right now its figuring out why you think I have an agenda
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
25. No, he couldn't declassify Plame
but he could declassify NIE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ObaMania Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
32. He may be able to do so..
.. but not when the operative is in unfriendly territory. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC