Some Dem Senators should call for Hearings on Cheney -- PRONTO!
Lex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-06-07 03:58 PM
Original message |
Some Dem Senators should call for Hearings on Cheney -- PRONTO! |
|
Congressional Investigational Hearings on the underlying treason that is inherent in the COVER-UP that the jury found happened with Libby.
Where there is smoke . . .
Come on! If it were the Pubs they'd be tripping over themselves to get to the microphones to call for hearings on the underlying treason.
|
LSparkle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-06-07 04:00 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Clinton was impeached for less ... in a CIVIL suit |
|
If Swingin Dick was instructing Scooter Skidmarks to cover up for him in a CRIMINAL trial, then it's time for him to be held accountable!
Even if "there isn't time" left in this lameass administration, they should still pursue it ON PRINCIPLE.
|
Lex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-06-07 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. The truth needs to be brought forth to the American people. |
|
That is one of the things Congress is there for--to make sure the White House is held accountable for high crimes and misdemeanors. And to investigate these things where there is a good reason--well, there is a very good reason based on this jury verdict.
|
endarkenment
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-06-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Uh, no - the hearings should start in the House not the senate. |
|
And they should be the groundwork for the impeachment of Cheney. The Senate should wait for the House to move. Not that the House will do anything, sigh.
|
Lex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-06-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Uh, yes--some DEM with a name that gets into the NEWS should call for investigations. |
|
I don't give a rat's whether it is a Dem Senator (who are more high profile in the news usually) or someone in the House who calls for hearings! Jesus. They need to start calling for investigational hearings NOW and not splitting hairs.
|
demrabble
(500 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-06-07 04:09 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The Presidential Candidates Should Call For Hearings |
|
Anyone who wants to be President should immediately call for hearings into the Treason -- as well as other high crimes and misdemeanors underlying the Libby verdict.
|
Lex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-06-07 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Yes, anyone with a profile high enough to really get it into the news |
|
and get the ball rolling on real investigations and hearings.
|
Lex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-06-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Bump -- And has *any* Democrat called for an investigation of the White House |
|
to see who Scooter was covering for? (We know, but it HAS to come out.)
|
garybeck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-06-07 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. exactly. what are they waiting for. i hope this is just about timing. |
|
Waxman and Conyers hopefully are just arranging their cards.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:22 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.