|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
kpete
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:28 PM Original message |
Pelosi Opposing Contempt for Rove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PDJane
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. OK, why the hell not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LVjinx
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 01:03 AM Response to Reply #1 |
77. You nailed it. Good old fashioned spinelessness. She's a disgrace. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #77 |
144. No. It's blackmail. If she were spineless, she would let the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:02 AM Response to Reply #1 |
80. We say this every time she does something subversive like this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillParkinson
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
3. What the Hell is wrong with that woman!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sen. Walter Sobchak
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. she got her private jet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:05 AM Response to Reply #10 |
81. Timing is everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old Codger
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
135. she is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. who is Pam Miles? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 06:04 PM Response to Reply #4 |
38. I searched for "Pelosi+Rove" I found very similar posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 06:12 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. I think this is the oldest one with Pam Miles being referenced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pleah
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 08:32 AM Response to Reply #4 |
95. Info on Pam Miles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
5. At least I have some contempt for Rove. That doesn't count, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rambler_american
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 12:07 PM Response to Reply #5 |
121. I have contempt for Rove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomInTib
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
6. They must have something on her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sal Minella
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. We know the level of moral turpitude Dick Cheney inhabits -- I can easily imagine those people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomInTib
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Oh, it's a lot easier than that. Blackmail.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paparush
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 07:20 AM Response to Reply #18 |
90. All that warrantless wiretapping - You KNOW a great deal of it was directed at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. if that's the case then she needs to get out, like YESTERDAY.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
26. I still think it's a protection racket, not blackmail. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomInTib
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 06:09 PM Response to Reply #26 |
40. I don't. Nothing is easier than blackmail. And everyone has something to hide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #40 |
131. Could be both. But you know these thugs would not stoop to threats if blackmail didn't work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 07:48 AM Response to Reply #26 |
92. Exactly. Blackmail is more comforting to those who seek to trivialize an entirely corrupt system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #92 |
133. Seems really obvious to me. BTW, I love your username. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #26 |
151. Far-fetched tin foil theory -- Maybe there is a gambler in her family. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:25 PM Response to Reply #151 |
159. "Pelosi's conduct is so strange ... that I can only explain it with crazy theories" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frog92969
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:39 PM Response to Reply #151 |
162. Speaking of gambling... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 12:26 AM Response to Reply #162 |
173. More on Pelosi and her son |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:06 AM Response to Reply #6 |
82. I used to think that, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arikara
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #6 |
115. Doesn't look like fear to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
7. that sucks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
8. If David Swanson posted it, it must be reliable information & I'll do my part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojambo
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
9. Of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:09 AM Response to Reply #9 |
83. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DebbieCDC
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 05:20 PM Response to Reply #83 |
167. "Vichy Democrats" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
12. What the fuck is WRONG with her?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anitar1
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 12:23 AM Response to Reply #12 |
76. What iws wrong with her? I think she is a DINO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
13. I just called Conyers' office; phone rang & rang until I was diverted back to switchboard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:47 PM Response to Reply #13 |
29. Same for Sheila Jackson Lee, but left a message for Pelosi and sent an email |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
14. my dear friends in nor*cal.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpookyCat
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 10:52 PM Response to Reply #14 |
69. We'll try...I promise... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HowHasItComeToThis
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
15. AND SHE IS MY REP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. you know what to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Let's see if Jerry Brown can find a few charges for her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #22 |
132. I would love to see him take it on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. Did you vote for Shirley Golub? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:48 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. There is one more way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:48 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. AMEN to that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 12:15 PM Response to Reply #30 |
127. As long as it helps Obama get elected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 01:41 PM Response to Reply #30 |
136. hi jgraz! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #136 |
142. Hate to say it, but JE has no chance at the veep slot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #142 |
143. Feingold has to be either VP or Senate Majority Leader in 2009! PERIOD! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #143 |
146. Let's just make him King of the World for the next few years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #142 |
145. thanks, and I agree on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 03:57 PM Response to Reply #142 |
150. Politically, I'm frightened Obama is going for a Trojan Horse "Libermann" . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DebbieCDC
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 05:22 PM Response to Reply #142 |
168. JE for Attorney General |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 01:11 PM Response to Reply #27 |
134. I did! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 09:13 AM Response to Reply #15 |
101. call her please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 03:59 PM Response to Reply #15 |
152. Get out and work to get her out of the House. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Overseas
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
16. I was hoping this wasn't true. How very sad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HowHasItComeToThis
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. REAL AMERICANS WANT ROVE TO HANG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
17. What A Sorry Excuse For A Speaker Of The House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
20. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
24. Again, I'm going to want more than friend-of-a-friend before I believe it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
25. She's Complicit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 09:53 PM Response to Reply #25 |
68. she appears to be one of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #25 |
154. This "blackmail" thing . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asthmaticeog
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
28. Getting pretty fucking sick of her. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
32. I've got growing "comtempt" for Pelosi . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fla nocount
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
33. You have to wonder who her bosses are and from which side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
34. California AG's Public Inquiry Contact Info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
35. Her silence and her failure to publicly support Conyers are themselves deplorable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trof
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
36. I posted this earlier. Got locked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 06:16 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. it's been unlocked and just a fyi we work on consensus...it really is a unsubstantiated rumor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. I hope you are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 06:31 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. so do I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trof
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 06:36 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. Hi. I'll tell ya everything I know re Pam Miles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:12 AM Response to Reply #36 |
84. Then you need to give them a bit of a break |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #84 |
153. Yup, DU can at times be a rough and troubled sea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:03 PM Response to Reply #36 |
155. Isn't there a lot of capitol hill rumor/discussion things -- anyone taped into that ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
37. The hell with the phone lines. Time to burn something else up. Or down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
39. Crap...... Damn her...... I'm so sick of her shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 07:25 PM Response to Reply #39 |
54. moderator maddezmom says it's a rumor, because we don't know who Miles is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 08:15 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. Here is a contact page- CALL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #60 |
70. Don't worry about that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 10:55 PM Response to Reply #60 |
71. Fucking mailbox full. Will try again tomorrow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 03:53 PM Response to Reply #71 |
147. Is anyone else having trouble getting thru on the toll free lines to Congress???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Plucketeer
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 09:38 AM Response to Reply #60 |
103. What I wrote....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 09:21 PM Response to Reply #103 |
171. MEOW-za-GRRRRRRR... Great letter! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bronco214
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 12:22 PM Response to Reply #60 |
128. Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 09:23 PM Response to Reply #128 |
172. Welcome to DU!!! Jump in with BOTH feet! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
41. Can't hold Rove accountable, but she has no problem voting to censure MoveOn.org |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #41 |
156. Quite a precedent was set there with that "censure" . . .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
global1
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
44. My Theory Is If Rove Get's A Contempt Charge And Is Hauled Before The.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 06:46 PM Response to Reply #44 |
50. And the message then is if Bushco is prosecuted after they leave office... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
global1
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 07:18 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. And The Alternative Is To Prosecute Them All - Find The All Guilty Now.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 07:36 PM Response to Reply #52 |
57. He will do that anyway, if we don't do anything... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sofa king
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 05:22 AM Response to Reply #57 |
86. They may be worse than we think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 05:04 PM Response to Reply #52 |
166. Contempt charges only last during this congress. When it's over so is the charge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
45. Is Pelosi and Prescott Bush connected by the Malta organization? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blarch
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
49. Nancy is protecting war criminals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 06:48 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. She isn't simply protecting them, she's collaborating with them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cascadian
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 07:22 PM Response to Original message |
53. How the Hell did she win the primary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stimbox
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 08:27 PM Response to Reply #53 |
63. I'm among the 10% that voted for Golub and the smaller percentage that volunteered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
55. Again Swanson attacks Pelosi without verifiable accusation. Wake me up when the proof arrives. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 11:36 PM Response to Reply #55 |
73. David Swanson has more of my respect than Nancy Pelosi does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 11:46 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. We disagree there, but reasonable people can agree to disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
56. Deleted sub-thread |
biglake
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
58. CONYERS COMPROMISED- WIFE IN DETROIT COUNCIL- LOTS OF HEAT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 09:48 PM Response to Reply #58 |
67. Link please. I'd like to forward this to someone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crickets
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 06:03 AM Response to Reply #67 |
88. Links |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biglake
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 08:34 AM Response to Reply #88 |
96. thanks for the link info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucognizant
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 12:07 PM Response to Reply #58 |
122. SO............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
59. She promised accountability, she delivers immunity, again n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reprehensor
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
61. jeezus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
62. Color me surprised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:15 AM Response to Reply #62 |
85. It's Monday? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
64. Deleted message |
fla nocount
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 09:18 PM Response to Reply #64 |
65. I like .the convolutions but drop the Jew baiting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connonym
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
66. I'm developing some mighty contempt for Ms Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
72. damn her! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow
![]() |
Mon Jul-07-08 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
75. I'm sure she opposes contempt for herself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 01:47 AM Response to Original message |
78. Freeper of The House -- DINO extraordinaire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:01 AM Response to Original message |
79. So, we really can't impeach |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 05:41 AM Response to Original message |
87. should be more skepticism here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomp
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 07:02 AM Response to Reply #87 |
89. do go on...please. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 07:30 AM Response to Reply #89 |
91. few are calling bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 07:55 AM Response to Reply #91 |
93. After funding the occupation, FISA, "impeachment OFF the table," it's easy to understand why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
electropop
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
94. Forget contempt OF Congress. This is contempt BY Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biglake
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 08:42 AM Response to Original message |
97. Why? FIRST WHO IS NANCY PELOSI- WE DONT KNOW ENOUGH- SOMEONE START A |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
98. Left my fucking message on some stupid fucking comment line which will never be heard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maineman
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
99. Hey San Francisco, Pelosi is your responsibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 09:18 AM Response to Reply #99 |
102. all her disgusted constituents should pay a visit to her home |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
100. Get on the Phones everyone!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
104. Could use a better reference than his "firm confirmation" eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:38 PM Response to Reply #104 |
160. Funny how nobody else thinks that's important, huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ashandaurynsgramma
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
105. she's a Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColonelTom
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
106. On the positive side, she's proven to be a strong leader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 10:36 AM Response to Reply #106 |
110. Can you qualify that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColonelTom
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #110 |
141. The primrose path, of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
107. We need to get rid of her. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBlueSky
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
108. All I can say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
109. Pelosi these days is every bit as contemptible as Rove ever was . . . n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBlueSky
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 10:40 AM Response to Reply #109 |
111. One Blue... lemee take that one step further... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kmac3
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
112. Got to be holding something big on her . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
113. The Pelosi Traitor never seems to disappoint, does she? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrZeeLit
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
114. Would that she could vanish into thin air. But she's too dense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katty
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
116. SICK OF NANCY! get out of the way, Nancy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
117. A thousand words........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveable liberal
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
118. colassal disappointment Nancy. You suck. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
119. funny timing that right now the DOJ is after Conyer's wife... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biglake
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #119 |
124. exactly-brazen too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:09 PM Response to Reply #119 |
157. Wasn't that on a very low simmer . . . ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biglake
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
120. PELOSI/ San Francisco site for telecom domestic / whistleblower Klein |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
123. I will reserve judgement on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1monster
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
125. Of course she is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dukkha
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
126. I have nothing but contempt for Pelosi-R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frisbee
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
129. Paging Skinner... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
130. Deleted message |
kristopher
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
137. An alternative explanation that still speaks poorly of poor Nancy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FunMe
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
138. Maybe shewas always a repbubliCON ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
139. nancy always seems to think there is "more important" business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:11 PM Response to Reply #139 |
158. And . . . are we doing any better with Sen. Harry Reid . . . !!! HOYER . .. ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duppers
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
140. on my 4th call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jester Messiah
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
148. It's very sad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarinCoUSA
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
149. Throw a bucket of water on her. See if she melts. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
161. Is her seat that safe in her district? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff30997
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:44 PM Response to Reply #161 |
164. I just hope it's a catapult seat ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:58 PM Response to Reply #161 |
165. Of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
163. Deleted message |
JackDragna
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
169. Benedict Arnold. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks
![]() |
Tue Jul-08-08 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
170. Boycott San Francisco |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mind_your_head
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
174. Yeah, she's a disgrace ~ and all that~ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 01:01 AM Response to Original message |
175. Are we really surprised by her cowardice at this point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC