|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:05 AM Original message |
****OFFICIAL FISA THREAD 3**** (They're voting on the Dodd/Feingold/Leahy amendment) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
1. Breaking Hard: Feingold votes for his Bill!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Does anyone ever ask him to explain that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
2. "Mr. Feingold - Aye" - Specter voted "no" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:08 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. I didn't expect that atfer yesterday. But Specter always does that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:14 AM Response to Reply #7 |
42. I could have sworn just this morning he said he'd vote for all the amendments. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwparker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:34 AM Response to Reply #7 |
120. Not watching, but would that be talk tough before the cameras and then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
3. Not holding out much hope here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
4. Mr. Sanders - aye :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
5. I count 16 ayes, but not sure. anyone have a count? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
8. Obama votes Aye on Dodd - Feingold Amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
9. "Mr. Obama, Aye." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:10 AM Original message |
Do you mean... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maddezmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
10. Obama voted aye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
11. Obama Votes Aye... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philly_bob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:09 AM Original message |
My C-Span screen says it needs 60 votes to pass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:09 AM Original message |
ok. so if the ammendment fails, they CAN vote out the whole bill, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redirish28 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
12. Did I hear that right? Obama voted Aye for the Amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:09 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. yes. But he didn't speak or help the filibuster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:10 AM Response to Reply #14 |
20. and I guess he's planning on voting yes on the whole thing, without the Dodd-Fgold amdmt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:12 AM Response to Reply #20 |
31. We shall see.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redirish28 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:10 AM Response to Reply #14 |
21. i'm surprised. Last I heard he wasn't going to vote for the Amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:12 AM Response to Reply #21 |
34. I never heard that - he's always said he opposes the immunity provisions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:13 AM Response to Reply #21 |
40. He always said he would. But, in final passage, he will vote for the bill even if the amendment is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:14 AM Response to Reply #21 |
44. His position was ALWAYS to stip the telecom immunity provisions from the bill... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #21 |
106. He said he would vote for amendments to improve the bill, and would support the bill even if those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #14 |
47. the filibuster hasnt happened yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:24 AM Response to Reply #47 |
99. They voted on cloture back in June: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
13. K&R'd... Thanks, Gately ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
15. Biden - Aye! (That's my guy!) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:10 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. yay! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
16. rec 2! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
17. Alot of No votes and Obama votes Aye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
19. More Ayes than I thought there would be -- is there hope?? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:11 AM Response to Reply #19 |
24. No. 60 Ayes are needed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
22. Clinton Aye?? I hear that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:11 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:11 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Yep! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:11 AM Response to Reply #22 |
30. I never got through to her office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
23. Clinton & Boxer... Aye ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
27. Webb voted no? wtf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:13 AM Response to Reply #27 |
36. Follow the $$$.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:13 AM Response to Reply #36 |
39. telecoms big in VA? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:14 AM Response to Reply #36 |
41. Yup. Telecomm is big in Virgina. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidwparker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:39 AM Response to Reply #27 |
122. WTF is right if true. Maybe I need to sit out the 2012 senate vote here in VA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
28. Webb no? :( |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:12 AM Response to Reply #28 |
35. damnit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:18 AM Response to Reply #28 |
68. He's been a big proponent of telco immunity since he joined the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
29. Webb NO???? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #29 |
57. Webb was a life long republican and even voted for Bush for President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
32. Webb again votes no, just like he did in February :( n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #32 |
48. February vote to strike immunity...link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
33. Menendez aye, Whitehouse aye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
37. McCaskill no??... Kerry aye! :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #37 |
54. She changed her vote. Not a big surprise here. She is a Puke in Dems clothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
38. McCaskill -- NO?? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #38 |
52. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:19 AM Original message |
Sadly predictable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
43. Hagel no :-( nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redirish28 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
45. Does anyone know of a link I can go to that will have the vote published with ayes and nos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #45 |
50. go to the senate website |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redirish28 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:19 AM Original message |
thanks for the help.. Is it updated quickly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
115. It will likey take at least an hour (and maybe two or three) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #45 |
53. It will be all over the internet in an hour or so my friend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #45 |
56. Link will be updated later.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:14 AM Original message |
Feinstein. the b........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
51. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
46. Salazar votes no! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #46 |
55. Is anyone surprised? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
49. How cool would it be if this passes, and the Nays only needed ONE MORE VOTE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #49 |
58. For the third time we need 60 Ayes and I would be surprised if we even broke 40 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:21 AM Response to Reply #58 |
82. I understand that - it's just a fantasy. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:17 AM Response to Reply #49 |
59. in a real democracy, thisd crap wouldn't have a chance! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:17 AM Response to Reply #49 |
66. That would be unbelievably cool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
60. Amendment failed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:17 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. 32-66 :( nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:19 AM Original message |
as was predicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
61. DAMNIT DAMNIT DAMNIT DAMNIT DAMNIT DAMNIT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #61 |
78. This atrocity is going to pass. What are we going to do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #78 |
110. We're Going To Elect Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:30 AM Response to Reply #110 |
119. Sure. But I don't think that just caving from now until then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:40 AM Response to Reply #119 |
124. If you call it caving in then you are not really supporting Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:51 AM Response to Reply #124 |
125. berni, I'm not talking about Obama. I'm talking about Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:40 AM Response to Reply #110 |
123. Seems to me they are going the wrong way if they were trying to that..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
63. 32 ayes 66 nos. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
64. Amerika is so screwed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
65. I still can't get the "Live" link to work on CSPAN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:18 AM Response to Reply #65 |
70. try c-span 2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #70 |
76. That's what I always use |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #70 |
79. Oooooh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #65 |
75. How aggravating - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
67. Oh my god. I'm actually tearing up. This is heartbreaking. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:18 AM Response to Reply #67 |
71. Let's keep in mind that this bill only affects civil lawsuits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #71 |
104. I know, but I'm so disappointed in our "representatives" seemingly not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:38 AM Response to Reply #71 |
121. From my understanding we needed the ability to have civil suits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
69. wow Arlene doesnt look that good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #69 |
74. I like what he's saying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
72. This senate has been out of order all morning! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
73. Spectert is crazy. He jsut voted no and now he argues against immunity! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #73 |
77. and saying earlier and now more debate needed, yet voted no - wants his own amdt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:21 AM Response to Reply #77 |
84. obviously so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redirish28 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:21 AM Response to Reply #73 |
85. I don't want to sound rude but I honestly have to ask: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
80. there's Byrd in the background (I asked about him earlier) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #80 |
91. Oh - I'm so glad to hear he's actually there. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #80 |
94. PS -- Have you seen Joe? Who's he hanging with? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:24 AM Response to Reply #94 |
98. my video screen is so little and fuzzy when voting - can only pick out women in colorful suits! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #98 |
107. Just wondered if he was in off-floor discussions with Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #98 |
108. Is that Clinton in the red jacket? lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #108 |
113. oh, and Bond in that yellow jacket and with the head tilt! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
81. Now what are they voting on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:21 AM Response to Reply #81 |
86. I think Specter has an amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #86 |
90. Is it a different one to strip immunity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:24 AM Response to Reply #90 |
100. As I understand it, Specter amendment delays immunity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #86 |
92. The Specter amendment calls for dismissing all active |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #92 |
96. ack! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #96 |
111. No kidding. Well put. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #81 |
93. Specter amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #81 |
95. "requires lawsuits to be didsmissed unless a federal court finds the law has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #95 |
112. Which law? The one that made warrantless wiretapping illegal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
83. 5 months later they pick up ONE vote to srtike immunity... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #83 |
89. It's better than NO vote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
87. Rockefeller is a real stand up guy. isn't he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
88. roll-call on 2nd amendment - specter's - post from last thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:24 AM Response to Reply #88 |
97. ok. now I'm hoping for this one to pass. It's something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #97 |
102. depeding on who the federal judge is. They tend to be Bush appointees. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #97 |
103. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:27 AM Response to Reply #103 |
117. This ammendment doesn't amke sense. it just takes the lawsuits out of their jurisdicitons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #88 |
114. Thanks for reading :)) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
101. What is the Specter amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #101 |
105. see thread above by Joel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
109. new thread time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:27 AM Response to Reply #109 |
116. thread 4 is up!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-09-08 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
118. ****THREAD 4***** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Jan 02nd 2025, 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC