|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Political Tiger
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:01 PM Original message |
Pelosi NOT Trying To Block Rove Contempt Charge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. but Pam Miles said it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharp_stick
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. And she had firm commitment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. What mea culpa? A politican has denied something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. And she's a Democratic Activist! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 04:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
58. jeez, I am tired of politicians saying they COULD hold someone in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tim4319
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. I hope this is true! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Some people are very quick to believe the worst about Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:08 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. I didn't think a bad thing about Conyers or Waxman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:08 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. "I've known too many Spaniards." -- The Princess Bride. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #10 |
47. For good reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
4. Who cares if it is true or not? It makes for such a good rumor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
6. Now that Pelosi has denied it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
7. And this won't get one one-hundredth all the PELOSI IS A TRAITOR threads got |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:21 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blarch
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 06:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
62. "never any reason" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 11:07 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:48 AM Response to Reply #63 |
69. Yep. Let criminals walk, it's the American way! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 02:28 AM Response to Reply #69 |
71. If the Judiciary committee voted out articles of impeachment tomorrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blarch
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 05:57 AM Response to Reply #63 |
72. It's a fact MF. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
8. The Judicary Committee source was Wasserman Schultz. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
39. DLC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. I'm hating this. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. It has the stench of manipulation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:44 AM Response to Reply #8 |
67. here is wasserman schultz on Abrams ..and she says nothing about Pelosi blocking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TreasonousBastard
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
12. My mind is made up-- don't confuse me with facts! Pelosi has... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:20 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. What facts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TreasonousBastard
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. One blogger has an anoymous source and you believe it, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:29 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. I don't trust anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. No. One person in Pelosi's office and one of her surrogates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:39 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. And, I just called the District Office here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #16 |
26. Was that supposed to be an answer to "What facts?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TooBigaTent
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
15. Has she said anything indicating support for a contempt charge? Didn't think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. aha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
21. She doesn't have to ask the Judiciary not to seek charges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:37 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. good save! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. Waxman, Conyers and Leahy have requested many much needed contempt charges against GOPers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. sorry about Bolten and Miers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. Oh bull, the route she took for Meirs & Bolton was useless, on purpose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. sickening dishonesty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. Dishonesty? Are Meirs and Bolton sitting in a jail cell right now and I missed it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. yeah, like I said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Sticking your fingers in your ears and murmering na na na na na |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:44 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. yet another lie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Good day to you too sir |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #46 |
57. WTF? What wasn't true? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:29 AM Response to Reply #57 |
65. "Pelosi supported no contempt charges" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 08:16 AM Response to Reply #65 |
73. She supports none that are meaningful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
24. Inthat case, I would like to hear her state that she IS encouraging contempt charges. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Call and ask for one. I just did in the context of needing her position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:54 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Indeed. Let us hear her position on what she IS doing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #24 |
37. I agree.... I want to hear her and Hoyer support it and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stimbox
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
25. Brendan Daly is Dana Perino in drag... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:56 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. I really hate weasels and every time I call, I get too many of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stimbox
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:02 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. I hear ya Beth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. I was out of it when Shirley ran, with health stuff and money stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stimbox
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 09:47 AM Response to Reply #35 |
74. I hope you're doing better now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
30. until the contempt charges are issued, i'll believe otherwise.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeHereNow
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. BINGO! Inaction is the same as complicity or discouraging the judiciary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. yeah, bingo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:13 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. nobody is listening to you.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. cuz I'm rubbing your noses in it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. In what? Pelosi hasn't had the fortitude to issue a statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. you're funny.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:50 AM Response to Reply #43 |
70. You wish SO HARD you were. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vanboggie
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
41. Impeachment is still off the table, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
52. But people used FUCK a lot in those threads so it must have been true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Yes, yes, I have heard that is true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trof
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
56. Statement from Pam Miles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 04:57 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. I was called out just as Pam is being called out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:37 AM Response to Reply #56 |
66. then she should reveal her source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warren pease
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
60. Without the word "inherent" in front of contempt, it's useless... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 06:10 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
64. Good to know-thanks for posting.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
68. Best way to prove it is to ISSUE ONE, you coward. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC