|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
babylonsister
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 09:56 AM Original message |
Breaking: Rove's claim of executive privilege DENIED by House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
1. meanwhile i will kick and recommend this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
31. Impeachment Hearings Neutralize Executive Privilege |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
2. When is the arrest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 09:57 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. THAT would be a dream come true! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minnesota Raindog
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 10:08 AM Response to Reply #2 |
16. This is what I want to see leading the news some night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 10:17 AM Response to Reply #2 |
17. I don't know, but it needs to happen immediately IMO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
That Is Quite Enough
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 09:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
34. Whenever somebody takes the initiative to run the pig down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
4. they can shove that executive privilege crap!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Happyhippychick
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
5. Anyone else planning to use Rove's mug shot as a screen saver? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 10:02 AM Response to Reply #5 |
10. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Happyhippychick
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. But it would be ugly and beautiful all at the same time. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kadie
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
6. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
7. Good news... thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zanne
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
8. Is the executive privilege denial by the House going to make a difference? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
9. So when they hold Rove in contempt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indenturedebtor
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 10:03 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. I think the likelihood of a strongly worded letter has now gone down. It stands at 75%! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
11. He did not show up in response to subpoena today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indenturedebtor
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 10:04 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Wow well it's not like there have been consequences in the past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
14. ROFL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
15. Then they should charge him with contempt. In addition, if the courts ruled that Bill Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 05:02 PM Response to Reply #15 |
27. Great point. That right there should have ended Exec. Privilege for all time. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
18. Yeah .... but too cowardly to find him in contempt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
19. I expect Rove to be hit with some strongly-worded statements any day now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
20. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
debbierlus
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
21. Put him in the basement until he testifies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
23. Next step: Denial of denial denied. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 03:13 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Denial is what the GOP are good at. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
25. After FISA, they owe us. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windoe
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
26. Enough with the words.....where is the action!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
28. Arrest his ass when his plane touches back down on US soil. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
29. Sure wish I knew more about the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
30. Anyone expect to see Inherit Contempt? I don't but I see this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 09:19 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. You forgot a few steps in there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
32. Oh, oh. Rover's going to the dog house. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
35. Only one Republican voted no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kitty1
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
36. Time for a little frog marching n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC