Energy experts knock Bush plan for ethanol as gas substitute
They say it would be costly and inefficient and might force choice: corn for food or fuel
David R. Baker, Chronicle Staff Writer
Thursday, January 25, 2007
Only one fuel -- ethanol -- can satisfy President Bush's plan to vastly expand America's use of gasoline substitutes, energy experts say.
And that might not be a good thing, they say.
In his State of the Union address Tuesday night, Bush said that within 10 years, he wants the United States to use five times as much alternative fuel as it does now. That step, coupled with tougher mileage standards on cars, would reduce gasoline usage by 20 percent, he said.
Ethanol is the only alternative fuel that can be produced in large enough quantities to meet his mandate, many experts say. And, as it is made in the United States, ethanol has serious drawbacks.
The vast majority of ethanol comes from corn. But diesel fuel powers the tractors that tend corn fields, natural gas runs the distilleries that produce ethanol, and more diesel is used to ship the finished product to market. The power you get out of corn ethanol, in other words, might just barely beat the power you put into it.
more...
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/01/25/MNGAUNOPVN1.DTL