|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
FourScore
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 09:25 PM Original message |
Frank Rich: "Top Bush Hands Starting to Get Sweaty About Where They Left Their Fingerprints." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyLib2
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. That should get a big reaction tomorrow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
2. This part makes me happy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 09:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. In six months, these "criminals" will have a full pardon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 09:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Too bad a "pardon" won't reach outside U.S. borders. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
103. Bush has already passed a bill that excludes him and anyone in his administartion from being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #103 |
109. Which in itself does not provide international immunity... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swilton
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 06:07 PM Response to Reply #109 |
120. I agree - doubt if they would have international immunity - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. If impeachment proceeding have begun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:41 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Why would that stop him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FourScore
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:58 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. I'm not sure, but I believe impeachment proceedings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 11:31 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Not that I know of. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madamesilverspurs
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:18 AM Response to Reply #28 |
65. But ...but....but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #65 |
98. Well, not sure why you posted under my post, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madamesilverspurs
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 02:19 PM Response to Reply #98 |
102. Thanks for your response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:36 AM Response to Reply #23 |
30. US Constitution, Article 2, Section 2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 02:42 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. That means he can't pardon an impeachment, not that he can't pardon while impeached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emanymton
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 06:54 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Vague. Can Be Exploited. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:36 AM Response to Reply #36 |
74. It's not vague. "For offenses, except impeachment..." How is that vague? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emanymton
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:35 PM Response to Reply #74 |
88. Whose Impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:55 PM Response to Reply #88 |
97. First, that "vagueness," if it existed, would work against Bush, not for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emanymton
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:34 PM Response to Reply #97 |
112. Orwell's Double Speak Make This All Clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 05:19 PM Response to Reply #97 |
118. Waittaminnit. Impeachment isn't conviction. I think that means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:35 PM Response to Reply #118 |
127. Sigh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Plucketeer
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:22 PM Response to Reply #36 |
86. The definition of is is.......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:38 PM Response to Reply #86 |
89. Pakistan could pardon Bin Ladden. We'd still kill him. The world won't pardon Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bjobotts
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:40 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. You saw Addington. Despicable human being.Hides among his peers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 02:42 PM Response to Reply #86 |
105. "Offenses against the United States" -- can't pardon from the World Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:44 AM Response to Reply #23 |
80. Link please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:14 PM Response to Reply #80 |
125. Link to the US Constitution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:46 PM Response to Reply #23 |
91. I think his pardon powers are limited only by those being impeached... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 02:18 AM Response to Reply #7 |
32. How can they be pardoned when they haven't been charged? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:03 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Wasn't Nixon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 09:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. (Hmph) Yeah ... stay in the U.S. where the people are too cowardly or criminal to do anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
floridablue
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 06:21 AM Response to Reply #2 |
35. Perhaps the Bushies will sell them a home lot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mamameow
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:55 AM Response to Reply #35 |
43. paraguay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:22 AM Response to Reply #43 |
53. That is the best news i have heard all week. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #35 |
99. Yeah, I thought about that, too. The hiding place of past war criminals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NancyG
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
82. Paraguay, anyone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
94. Comforting, yes, and it's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
104. UAE. No extradition treaty. Rich man's paradise. Halliburton moved their top 2 execs there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swilton
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 06:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
122. Poetic Justice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. Worse Than Watergate by John Dean! We'll see what the future |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. The New York Times. That should give the story exposure.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
5. Will they also be blamed for the next terra attack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
6. Cheney descended into the dark side to cover up Bush failure to heed bin Laden threat in 2001. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. I was a charter member of the Grassy Knoll Society - LIHOP cohort - before it was fashionable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:13 PM Response to Reply #13 |
84. Like I always say, if 9/11 wasn't LIHOP, then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 02:13 PM Response to Reply #84 |
101. I like that. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 06:58 PM Response to Reply #13 |
123. Yep. Always thought that the MIHOPers should pay more attention to the KISS principle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. I disagree with this analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noise
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:25 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. One would think Rich would be more curious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:40 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. yes, the lack of curiosity on all their parts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:55 AM Response to Reply #20 |
63. Lack of curiosity? That passive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #63 |
67. as opposed to purposefully looking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:40 AM Response to Reply #67 |
78. One poster on here used to put up a picture of Republican woman, I think, a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #78 |
83. They are blatant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:42 AM Response to Reply #20 |
79. Fundies. The US can do no wrong in their minds, so who would attack it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wizard
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:56 AM Response to Reply #18 |
44. What the hell was Rice doing in relation to all these urgent warnings? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swilton
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 06:13 PM Response to Reply #44 |
121. What was Rice doing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #44 |
124. In July 2001, Rice blew off Tenet and CIA briefers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:23 AM Response to Reply #18 |
61. Rich Is an Opinionator, Not an Investigative Journalist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:38 AM Response to Reply #61 |
75. Well, Sy Hersch, Robert Parry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buttercup McToots
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:45 AM Response to Reply #16 |
57. I agree with you BNL... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:51 AM Response to Reply #16 |
62. Yeah !!! I'm with the Naked guy above. He's right ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:27 AM Response to Reply #62 |
71. I don't want to insult you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #71 |
113. Pun intended......lol. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:21 AM Response to Reply #16 |
68. I suspect that all those statements are true, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 02:56 PM Response to Reply #16 |
106. Smirk and Sneer are connected to AQ Khan and Pakistani H-Bomb through BCCI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #106 |
131. thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:22 AM Response to Reply #6 |
54. The question remains-why did * fail to act when there were warnings from so many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiteTara
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #54 |
87. because they were busy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:05 PM Response to Reply #54 |
108. They needed a pretext for war with Iraq. September 11 made USA mad at 'Arabs.' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #108 |
117. IIRC, CIA didn't have flight school info...that was in 7/01 FBI memo from Phoenix office sent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:16 PM Response to Reply #54 |
111. They wiretapped so they could blackmail the Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 01:11 PM Response to Reply #111 |
132. that wiretapping was probably the first thing Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #54 |
116. My vote is on the New Pearl Harbor event. It seems they knew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
9. The Nixon White House was "The Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight" compared to this cabal ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jazzjunkysue
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
11. I hope Frank ups his body guard contigent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noise
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
12. Strange |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:24 AM Response to Reply #12 |
69. It's possible that the journalists are trying to send us signals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
15. What on earth do they have to worry about? It's not like anyone's going to do anything more... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleko
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:56 AM Response to Reply #15 |
31. That's what's so frightening. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pretzel4gore
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:29 AM Response to Reply #31 |
47. It unfolded too perfectly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emanymton
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:02 AM Response to Reply #15 |
37. Remember, These Jabroni Said They Reserve The Right To ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rusty fender
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:39 AM Response to Reply #37 |
77. Only problem for Bush is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
17. "This time the crime is worse than the cover-up..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
speedoo
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
19. K&R, and bookmarked. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnyCanuck
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
22. K&R n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
24. k&r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
25. "9/11? I was, um, too busy. Smirk." - Commander AWOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noise
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 11:22 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. This is why the Unitary Executive theory is garbage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Me.
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
26. I Don't Know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:20 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. I wouldn't count on that, Me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemoTex
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:04 AM Response to Original message |
38. Mayer's "Darkside" to be released 7/15. I ordered it yesterday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:13 AM Response to Original message |
39. If 9-11 was all preventable, let it forevermore ring from the rafters: LIHOP, LIHOP, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:21 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Oh, 9/11 was preventable alright...Weren't there over 60 warnings to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:03 AM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Everyone knows this, but the Democratic Congress continues to enable junior |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noel711
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
41. My two cents on this revelation...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:01 AM Response to Reply #41 |
45. blashemy i tell you blasphemy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wizard
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
42. The Slobodan Milosovicz suite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nradisic
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:54 AM Response to Reply #42 |
48. As a Serb I second that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
49. Thank you again, Mr. Rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conscious evolution
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
50. Evil allways leaves it's calling card |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DailyGrind51
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
51. The main difference with the Nixon/Watergate Era, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:19 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Exactly. Republicans are now a compliant Reichstag; Dems are enablers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:46 AM Response to Reply #52 |
58. Not alone, but it's a small minority without much of a stage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
young_at_heart
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:18 AM Response to Reply #58 |
66. Don't forget Dan Rather |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jade Fox
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:29 PM Response to Reply #66 |
95. It still shocks me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 05:27 PM Response to Reply #95 |
119. and don't forget |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PCIntern
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:29 AM Response to Reply #51 |
55. The reason that Rethugs 'joined' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:07 AM Response to Reply #55 |
60. What Nellie! Would love to hear more about "international and grassy knoll" issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
56. Is there anything that can stop Bush from issuing a mass pardon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:11 AM Response to Reply #56 |
64. Who is going to stop him? Not Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ejbr
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
59. The crime is worse than the cover up, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
young_at_heart
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
70. One wonders just how bad it has to get before people notice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phred42
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
72. They have to start worring about being Charged With MURDER in the First |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CubicleGuy
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
73. As sure as night follows day... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
76. "But we were only doing what we were told to do." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
81. Asscroft; "I don't want to hear about that anymore" = LIHOP or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
85. Any e-mails will still be caught up in the "natural security" wiretapping . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
92. “The Dark Side” ...see it here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erda
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
93. To me Frank Rich's article is somewhat of a smoke screen . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
90-percent
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
96. interesting link here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
100. I reread "The Final Days" a few months ago and the Nixon years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
107. K&R.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
110. "Nixon’s operatic boozing and weeping" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LuckyLib
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:54 PM Response to Reply #110 |
114. Yes. Extensive documentation of Tricky Dick in meltdowns with various aides, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
115. 385 comments on this on the NY Times as of 5:20 EDT. Never saw so many. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
126. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
128. Greasy republicon hand prints all over the place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
129. The editor's selection from the comment section. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
130. Here's to hoping they are arrested, convicted, and hang. What's Pelosi's office number again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
133. It's another kick... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Overseas
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
134. Let me KICK to keep this story up there. Sadly very true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC