Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Want to REALLY save some gas? Reduce congestion!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 12:19 PM
Original message
Want to REALLY save some gas? Reduce congestion!
Washington: Anti-Congestion Referendum Gathers Momentum
Washington state voter initiative to remove profit from red light cameras, synchronize traffic lights and reduce congestion clears first hurdle.

It appears increasingly likely that Washington state voters will have a chance to approve an anti-congestion initiative on the November ballot. Initiative 985 would remove profit from red light cameras, synchronize traffic lights and create a fund devoted to reducing congestion. Later today, activists representing the group Voters Want More Choices are planning planning to hand the Secretary of State's office more than 226,000 signatures -- exceeding the minimum required to certify the measure for the upcoming election.


snip

Initiative 985 is a package of specific measures intended to reduce traffic congestion. First among these is a simple requirement forcing city and state traffic engineers to synchronize traffic lights at busy intersections. The state auditor would be required to verify the performance of these changes to travel time, emissions and fuel consumption. The state auditor predicted between ten and twenty-five percent reduction in these factors from synchronization alone.

http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/24/2431.asp


The big dirty secret is that most municipalities have either completely ignored their traffic light timing or have deliberately timed the lights to be more ticket-friendly than traffic friendly. Vehicles traveling at a constant speed use less fuel, pollute less and have fewer accidents. When lights are synchronized to allow a smoother flow of traffic, compliance with the traffic laws also increases. Which is exactly why this issue is largely ignored; making it easy for a driver to get from A to B negatively impacts ticket-generated revenue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. You know what I have seen recently that totally relieves congestion and saves gas?
Round abouts. Instead of intersections. there are two of them out by my house and I've never stopped or seen anyone stopped at one.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Good point!!
And no lights to use electricty or fail at just the wrong time. Also much safer because it is nearly impossible to have a T-bone crash.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yep, we've had quite a few put in around here recently.
I live a few miles from Modesto California, and they've been big on roundabouts in recent years. Opinions seem pretty polarized on them though...some people love them, and others hate them. I love them because I've never had to stop at one for more than a few seconds. I do know several people who dislike them because of near misses...all caused by people who either didn't know how they worked or ignored the rules (a common problem is people trying to go all the way around in the outer lane, cutting off the thru drivers). They actually had a developer throw a temper tantrum and cancel an entire shopping center development when they found out that the city was putting a roundabout on its major intersection. The city stood its ground, the people love that roundabout now, and another developer came in and built a center there.

I always wonder at people who claim that stoplights are superior. Stoplights are all about STOPPING. Roundabouts are designed to keep you moving. Why some people would prefer to spend 3 minutes staring at a red light, instead of 3 seconds waiting for a merge opportunity in a roundabout, is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. shaving or putting on makup on their way to work, is the only reason I can think
of for people wanting to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I like the roundabout idea
Twenty years ago the traffic engineers around here decided that every slightly busy intersection needed a light. And now we're paying the price. I think roundabouts at some of the low-mid volume intersections would significantly reduce the time everybody is waiting around. There are also a couple of high volume intersections that would probably benefit from becoming a rotary but the space just isn't there to make one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. There are also several unnecessary stop signs in my neighborhood.
Lately I've been rolling through them to save gas. I assume I'll eventually get a ticket, but the gas it saves will likely offset the cost of the ticket. I plan to let the cop know exactly why I didn't stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes those are called "traffic calming".
The idea being that if you don't make drivers stop every 1000 feet, they will lose all sense of self control and live out their NASCAR fantasies for the next seven blocks.

And just because three people last year did that, everybody has to pay the price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Yeah I hate that crap
Last year my city installed speed tables throughout my neighborhood. They aren't quite as annoying as stop signs, since you can go 15mph over them, but there's nothing stopping me from flooring it on the other side of the table and defeating the purpose of it. I swear the city must get get kickbacks from the brakepad manufacturers or something for installing these stupid things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, that's going to blow the Prius gas mileage all to hell and gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. The stop lights in Phoenix are all timed wrong. People sitting @ red lights, with not
one car coming the other direction. Just sitting for nothing in many cases at many intersections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "Just sitting for nothing in many cases at many intersections"
Edited on Tue Jul-15-08 12:56 PM by MindPilot
Nothing is right; sitting at a light you are getting exactly zero miles per gallon.

It's really irritating late at night or early morning when you know you are the only car within a quarter mile radius, but you still have to sit at that damn light. Especially those flat intersections where you can actually SEE for that quarter mile radius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. Another article -- Seattle is re-syncing it's lights and proves it works
Retiming traffic lights should help improve downtown traffic flow

Seattle officials said Wednesday that they've synchronized signals at 258 downtown intersections for the first time in more than two decades and promised quicker, less polluting trips through the central business district will result.

Drivers will still encounter red lights between Jackson Street, Denny Way, Boren Avenue and Elliott Bay, but the city predicted a 12 percent reduction in stops and 40 percent shorter travel times through the 1.25-mile long district.

snip

Mayor Greg Nickels, announcing the downtown signal changes Wednesday, said they should help reduce motorist frustration and cut fuel consumption and cut greenhouse gas emissions.

Sheridan quoted the mayor as saying, "the best car trip is one not taken. However, we all have to drive and based on that the city is committed to making travel ... faster and more efficient."

snip

In a separate set of changes, the city last year resynchronized signals at 193 other intersections around the city; and based on subsequent checks, travel times there improved an average of 40 percent during morning peaks, 28 percent in afternoon peaks and 33 percent at mid-day, the city said.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/transportation/369392_streetlight03.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC