|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
ck4829 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 07:04 AM Original message |
Does Scalia even know the basics of law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 07:08 AM Response to Original message |
1. Its a lot worst than just scalia being an idiot and a tool for the neoCON's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 07:09 AM Response to Original message |
2. He's not an idiot, He's a thug. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 07:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Ding Ding Ding! WINNAH! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 07:44 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. He is a fascist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DangerDave921 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 07:25 AM Response to Original message |
3. I will explain why you are wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 07:37 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Wrong. Gore asked for manual recounts; part of the election process, not a legal challenge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DangerDave921 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 08:28 AM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Clarify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 09:00 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. No, I am not saying Gore never filed any suits. Just that Bush took the election to court first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
5. Well, Gore did take it to the courts to get the recount going |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 07:40 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Wrong. See above. It was a request for recount in 4 counties, NOT a court challenge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 08:01 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I guess I isn't learning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 08:20 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Well, you're right about most of your post. It WAS state law, and it WAS allowed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 08:22 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. The other loathsome thing is that BushCo's only objective was to stop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 07:38 AM Response to Original message |
7. He's not an idiot. He's corrupt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
10. Scalia is a liar. BUSH brought the FEDERAL court action, not Gore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
14. Please Democrats IMPEACH THIS BASTARD.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
17. Only his own and Bush's law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
18. As if there is something wrong with filing a suit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-16-08 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
19. not an idiot, a cunning propagandist who knows he won't be challenged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC