|
Okay, so perjury is perjury, be it Clinton's or Libby's, though it's obvious to sane people how very, very different the two cases are.
But here's the real question: shouldn't the effects of perjury be part of the legal process?
Clinton's lying about a personal matter had no direct impact on anyone other than his family. It ended there.
Libby's lying is part of a chain of events that affects every single American, every single Iraqi, and every single member of the "coalition of the willing." War affects millions. Blowjobs don't. (Hey, another bumpersticker!)
Seriously, though, are the direct effects of perjury part of the legal process? If someone is found guilty of perjury, can the process be continued legally by asking this question and furthering investigation? Can we make a citizen's arrest or something to that effect?
|