Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This editorial in my local paper angers me:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 06:41 PM
Original message
This editorial in my local paper angers me:
Editorial: Libby's conviction brings skepticism to boiling point

I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby is guilty. After almost four years of investigation and trials, the saga ignited by a diplomat's criticism of the White House's argument for invading Iraq is, for all intents and purposes, over.

So what did it all mean?

That depends greatly on where you stand. After all, Libby was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice even though the events he lied about were, apparently, not criminal in nature. At least, that's the only conclusion to draw from special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's decision to not prosecute anyone for unveiling Valerie Plame as a covert CIA agent to the media.

So if there was no initial crime, how bad can the whole thing be? Perjury is a serious felony, to be sure, but Libby's choice to cover up a "leak" that wasn't illegal was his own doing, and doesn't necessarily indicate any sort of greater conspiracy. Libby is no H.R. Haldeman.

What Libby's actions do indicate, however, is a White House more than willing to play fast and loose with the truth, as well as spin everything necessary to justify its policies.

more -

http://postcrescent.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070307/APC0602/703070691/1036/APCopinion

OK, the point of the editorial was how the White House tried to undermine things, which is true, but to say that there was no crime shows that they haven't been paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. the final line in that editorial say a lot.
But again, they are trying to say that the leak wasn't illegal. Which of course leads to finding Valerie Plame as not being a classified agent. What a bunch of bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. ask the editors if murder is not a crime
just because Al Capone was found guilty of tax evasion instead of murder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. What Clinton lied about wasn't a crime either.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well, he was a Democrat
isn't that a crime in itself? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I plead extremely guilty, then.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithjx Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ya know,
Saying that b/c Fitz didn't prosecute the outing, there was no crime, is like saying rape isn't a crime if you get away with it. Nice logic.
KJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratefultobelib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-07-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Perjury is a serious felony"--say no more!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC