Have you ever wondered if the wire tapping had anything to do
Road Scholar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 02:16 PM
Original message |
Have you ever wondered if the wire tapping had anything to do |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-17-08 02:20 PM by In_Transit
with the complete reversal of the democrats in congress? I mean could it be that some of the key ones like Nancy "you know who" are being extorted or blackmailed. I just don't understand it.I honestly believe that the whole eavesdropping scam was using terrorism as a smokescreen so they could dig up trash on political opponents.What do you think?
|
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Well it does most certainly BushCo is using blackmail to drive through its agenda |
NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message |
2. what are they doing that could allow them to be blackmailed? |
|
anyone in the public light ought to be leading a squeaky clean life. They should know that they are under incredible scrutiny.
No skeletons= no blackmail
and NO, I cannot run for office, nor would I want to. I'm not going to pretend to be clean.
|
Road Scholar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. You know the usual stuff, affairs, secret bank accounts, |
|
personal stuff like a blue dress somewhere.
|
elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I think it's obvious. Bribes, blackmail, anthrax threats, you name it. |
|
Anything goes w/ these guys.
|
rox63
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |
madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message |
6. YES, if I was a betting man I would bet on it, and have been saying that for a while now |
damntexdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message |
7. It had everything to do with the cave in by much of the leadership. |
|
Not necessarily that someone had the goods on them based on wiretapping -- rather that they had been beiefed on the illegal wiretapping and had not objected nor tried to take any action to oppose it. They abetted a crime, both after the fact and before (since the activity went on after they were briefed).
|
mitchtv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-17-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message |
8. of course you are right |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Jan 17th 2025, 06:43 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.