Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton vows to fight "insulting" abortion plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 09:51 AM
Original message
Clinton vows to fight "insulting" abortion plan
What the hell is wrong with these people, I can't even wrap my mind around this



http://www.reuters.com/article/wtMostRead/idUSN1843863720080718


By Michelle Nichols

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A Bush administration plan to define several widely used contraception methods as abortion is a "gratuitous, unnecessary insult" to women and faces tough opposition, Sen. Hillary Clinton said on Friday.

The former Democratic presidential candidate joined family planning groups to condemn the proposal that defines abortion to include contraception such as birth control pills and intrauterine devices.

It would cut off federal funds to hospitals and states where medical providers are obligated to offer legal abortion and contraception to women.

"We will not put up with this radical, ideological agenda to turn the clock back on women's rights," the New York senator told a joint news conference with New York Rep. Nita Lowey, also a Democrat, at Bellevue Hospital.

"Women would watch their contraceptive coverage disappear overnight," said Clinton.

The planned rule is aimed at countering recent state laws enacted to ensure that women can get contraception when they want or need it. It also would help protect the rights of medical providers to refuse to offer contraception.

Clinton said she has written a letter with Patty Murray, a Democrat senator from Washington, to Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt asking him to reconsider and reject the release of the proposed rules.

She also urged people to sign a petition on her website, www.hillpac.com, against the proposed changes.

"Our first effort is to get the Bush administration to rescind the regulation, not issue in its current form," Clinton said. "If that doesn't succeed, we're going to be looking for legislative steps that we can take to prevent this regulation from ever going into effect."

A copy of a memo that appears to be an Department of Health and Human Services draft provided to Reuters this week carries a broad definition of abortion as any procedures, including prescription drugs, "that result in the termination of the life of a human being in utero between conception and natural birth, whether before or after implantation."

Conception occurs when egg and sperm unite in the Fallopian tubes. It takes three to four days before the fertilized egg implants in the uterus. Several birth control methods interfere with this, including the birth control pill and IUDs.

"If enacted, these rules will make birth control out of reach for some women. That's a sure way to guarantee more unintended pregnancies and more abortions," said Anne Davis of Physicians for Reproductive Choice and Health.

(Editing by Ellen Wulfhorst and Eric Beech)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. They're not even trying to hide that they're going after contraception. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. One more in a long list of reasons that
WE. MUST. WIN. THIS. ELECTION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hidden Stillness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. This Step Should Surprise No One
This should come as a surprise to absolutely no one. When you realize that their main objective is complete and total, anti-feminist subugation of women, and a dismantling of all laws promoting equality, then you realize you are just moving from sphere to sphere, killing everything. I remember, a few years ago, arguing with someone who was against abortion and kept calling it "murder," who claimed that I was a "hypocrite" for being against the murder of actual, live children, but supporting abortion, and I answered that this person was also a hypocrite, if I was. "You are against abortion, but not against birth control, which stops a pregnancy just as much," etc. The way it went during the discussion was that the person kind of agreed, that we both had what could be called a "flaw" to our positions, and we ended the discussion pretty well, not threatening or abusive.

Then when I thought about it later, it started to worry me that actually, a real extremist could exactly think of every God-damned thing as "baby-killing," and I never lost that fear. Now, as a matter of fact, here it is. Never forget--they do not care about women; they hate women most of all. They want to "protect" women by tying them (us) up in chains so they (we) don't "hurt" themselves or do something "bad." The ultimate goal is to take the entire public sphere of legal rights away from women, like an instant reversion to hundreds of years ago and subserviance to the male. This is what you WILL GET by appeasing these tyrannical people, ("Abortion should be rare...," etc.). Go Hillary Clinton--fight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The objective is to control women. Plain and simple. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. The American Taliban strikes again...
...gotta control them women - next they'll have us wearing burkas, not be allowed out without a male escort (ONLY husband or family member) and being denied education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
netania99 Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-19-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Has anyone tried to access the petition from the hilpac site?
Edited on Sat Jul-19-08 11:45 AM by netania99
I'm not seeing anything - just a sign up place. When I signed up, I got a thank you, but no way (that I could see) to get to the petition. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC