Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservative Senator Denied Delegate Slot For Not Being Right-Wing Enough

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 09:43 AM
Original message
Conservative Senator Denied Delegate Slot For Not Being Right-Wing Enough
Now this is just sad. Sen. Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican who has long led the conservative forces of his state, has been denied his customary position as a voting delegate to the Republican National Convention -- and it's being done by an even more conservative bunch.

The Iowa Christian Alliance, a successor to the state's Christian Coalition, has effectively taken over the state party's executive committee, and they obviously weren't happy with Grassley. It does seem curious, though, when one considers that he came up in the ranks of conservative activists and was elected to the Senate in 1980 on Ronald Reagan's coattails, and is a reliably conservative vote on issues like abortion and gay rights. What could have gotten them angry?

The Washington Times, of all places, has a hypothesis: Grassley teamed up with Democrat Max Baucus to investigate the finances of televangelists.

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/07/conservative_senator_denied_de.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Grassley not conservative enough?!
The Iowa "Christian" Alliance are quite obviously crazy people. I live in Iowa and Grassley has often irritated me and others because of his right wing views. But to be fair, he does sometimes actually work with Tom Harkin to try and help the people of Iowa. What a jerk! How dare he try and help the people who elected him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's the ticket boys...
Get yourself more conservative when the country is headed toward a progressive upswing.

Dag nabbit, I'm sticking with buggy whips.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. I love it. Let them take over and soon the "republican" party will be controlled
by Fred Phelps of Kansas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Chuckles Hit A Third Rail
Religious broadcasting is BIG money. For some "preachers" it's their meal ticket to the good life as they bring in millions of "donations" with only a fraction going to actual overhead (airtime rental, production)...and it's a large marekting tool...for selling merchandise, promoting books and tours and "building projects". This was how religious broadcasting grew in the 80's...especially via Jim & Tammy Faye...and how they and others found gold on the wasteland of cable and nose-bleed TV stations. And using a religious guise means avoiding millions and now billions in taxes.

The problem here is that Chuckles is digging at the money pot...the scam that goes on that fuels the religious broadcasting machine. It's a game that uses our public airwaves to present some of the most discriminating and narrow broadcasting around and has generated a lot of money that in turn buys influence. Chuckles is going against the Dobsons and telefundies who have grown in power and influence in the midwest and west...especially in NW Iowa. Under the surface lies the next embarassing scandal for religious broadcasting...and it took years for them to recover from the last one...they're gonna show Chuckles a thing or two to prevent the next one from happening.

I first met Grassley in 1988 and while there are few things I agree with the man on politically, he's one of the few true "compassionate conservatives".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC